Re: Etiquette statement
- From: JayKana@xxxxxxxxx (BJayKana)
- Date: Thu, 24 Aug 2006 14:54:01 -0500
f4_boy@xxxxxxxxxxx (TroytheTroll)
......Like the ability for it to fail if it gets overloaded, with say, a
couple of stories worth of weight jolting downwards from a
shock?..........
TroytheTroll comments:
I wasn't even going to mention this one but its so obvious, and Hank is
so clueless. Take a steel beam, overload it, and watch while it fails.
I'm guessing, noise, heat, sparks, flying fragments, and I'm not even
TRYING to be original here.
bjay@xxxxxxxxx
Hank loves to mention that the Fire Fighters heard mulitple explosions,
of which to Hank and his professor sources, believe with all thier
conspiracy hearts, that it was explosives hand set by people on the
ground. All along it was the heat from the jet fuel causing fires,
sparks, flying fragments, crushing noises, concrete moving,walls
falling, electrical popping and exploding,compessed air and water valves
bursting, and anything else that could go wrong, did go wrong, on the
morning of 9-11-01. BJK.
.
- Prev by Date: Re: Etiquette statement
- Next by Date: Re: Etiquette statement
- Previous by thread: Re: Etiquette statement
- Next by thread: Re: Etiquette statement
- Index(es):