Re: Septic takes another pole!

On Mon, 16 Mar 2009 13:29:32 -0400, T3 <notme@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 2009-03-15 18:04:13 -0400, Dave <no1@xxxxxxxx> said:

On Sun, 15 Mar 2009 09:39:40 -0400, T3 <notme@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I do believe anti-Amercanism is alive
and well. And by the way, I'm not here to make judgement whether it's
deserved, or not, though it is interesting to see it in action,

Sorry Tom, what you're seeing isn't anit-Americanism, it's
anti-***-ism. Namely anti-T3.

Wow Dave, that was stunning, stunningly feeble. It's like this Mr.
Dave, this is USENET and this is a NEWS DISCUSSION GROUP pertaining to
motorcycle racing, you with me so far? I hope so. My question to you
and anyone else as well, is what part of Spies (AKA septic) winning
another pole wasn't news and why didn't you want to discuss it as such?

Here's a clue, dumbass. How often do you see us discussing Superpole
results in rmr? You see, many of the regulars actually do avoid the
newsgroup during race weekends and by the time they return it's the
races that matter, not the Superpole. This time it just happened to
catch a few of us off guard because everything was a day earlier than
usual.

Given that you posted your troll early Friday morning just confirms
that you weren't intentionally trolling as you claim. You were here
to talk smack. But how often do you actually see that kind of
juvenile behavior here? Only when the likes of Auscars shows up.
When you got called on it you tried to twist it into some deliberate
attempt to oust the Spies haters. You have some twisted idea that
everyone who dislikes your attitude must be an anti-American Spies
hater, and the only evidence you can think of to support that notion
is that there wasn't a Superpole discussion already underway before
your early morning tirade. The fact is you jumped in and pulled an
Auscars before anyone even had a chance to strike up any discussions.


And then you go on to assume that I was referring to your spoiler
subject. Did I even mention it in my message?

Finally we get the prototypical T3 response to anyone challenging his
opinions for which he knows he has no defensible position...

He always starts with the "I'll make it simple for you..." insult.

I'll try to make this even easier for you to grasp, okay Dave? ...

Then there's the "I've been here longer than you!"

I gave my reasons for posting and if you knew anything about me,
or had spend much time in this group you would know ...

Followed by the attempt to turn the tables around with "what have YOU
done?"

exactly what has been your contributions here?

All of which is the hallmark of someone who has no ground to stand on
but refuses to change his position. Your post was empty and
completely devoid of any meaningful response, Tom.

BUT, let's not forget that we have to end with the absolute trademark
T3 closing that he always uses to weasel his way out of the
argument... "Don't bother responding because I'm smart and you're
stupid!"

Oh, just so you know, don't waste your time trying to claw your
way out of the big hole you've dug with any rebuttal, beating up on
unarmed goof's isn't my thing..

Ouch! That really put me in my place, didn't it? Oh how many times
has he tried to use that one! Give it up Tom. I'm not in a big hole
because I'm not the one blowing in here making unsubstantiated
prejudicial statements about the non-Americans in the group.


.

Loading