Re: A week's worth

On Sun, 13 Nov 2005 23:16:10 GMT, Chilly <wjghouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>BigPiper sed:

>>
>> No. By my calculations, I have two more stupid things to go for
>> qualification. I figure they will be trying to start in gear, and
>> pulling out with the kick stand down. Have I mis-counted?
>
>Well, yes and no. It's not a question of whether you've done *all* those
>things, it's whether you've done any number of them with any kinda
>frequency.

Or an audience...

>
>'Course, denial is a part of the process ...

It didn't happen on my watch...


Steve in San Diego
XLH1200 SENS BS135 DOF#1951
FAQ's at http://rmhfaq.com
rmh is IRL©
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Unacceptable floating point errors
    ... conditional formatting to match the values, and it returns a false condition. ... some of us rely on Excel for precise calculations ... Microsoft is reponsible for their products, ... so many really stupid customers, ...
    (microsoft.public.excel.misc)
  • Re: Help Constructing Fictional Cross-Religious Movement
    ... (Bags not me; it's not my ... > You have two conflicting goals here: ... qualification, however, certainly is one of my goals. ... This of course is why the thought is very stupid, ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: Gotta laugh at ...
    ... >>> qualification. ... But OTOH you're not stupid enough to declare it after your name in ...
    (uk.rec.driving)
  • Re: Gotta laugh at ...
    ... >> Steve Firth wrote: ... >>> qualification. ... But OTOH you're not stupid enough to declare it after your name ...
    (uk.rec.driving)
  • Re: Nobel Prize for David Thomson?!
    ... >>Then provide the calculations that show it agrees with the results of say ... You say you have a theory which is better than the Standard Model. ... Just standard science: ... There is nothing stupid about that. ...
    (sci.physics)