Re: SinisterFlames

les wrote...
> sinisterflames wrote...
>
> <snip>
>
>> Chopperchick emailed me the link to this thread and I thought all of
>> you can hear everything form the "horse's mouth".
>
> Instead, we get it from the horse's ass. Here are the headers from
> chopperchick's post:

<snip>

> Now the headers from your post... Please note the NNTP-Posting-Host:
> 82.165.39.56 address on both posts. There is only two ways that could
> happen. One fuckwit would make both posts, or 2 seperate people posting
> from the same computer.

<snip>

Playing devil's advocate here, but they both posted through a web based site
which could, I believe, allow people to post and the web service would then
pass it through an NNTP server, so anyone using that web service for posting
could have the same IP address showing up in here. You have to register to
post and I'm too lazy to do that to actually test it. I also think the
guy's right in saying that Ghost Flames is a style, may also have been a
company name, but it is still considered a style. I'm gonna hold off
judgement until Irv or Dr. Quinn post back after visiting the place (I
assume after saying the place doesn't exist that they'll now drop by), guy
could just be defending a legit business. Damn, I'm getting soft.

--
Tud
AH#115 SENS BS#111 LFS#32 FLF MISFIT
http://ah115.com
"There's only *one* RE."


.

Loading