Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- From: Jeff Barringer <jeffb@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 Nov 2005 08:15:52 -0600
Rufus wrote:
It may be able to be argued that your hypothesis would apply to national markings only; in that the stenciling could be considered "inherent to the design of the aircraft", and therefore intellectual property of the manufacturer...externally speaking.
Heaven help you if you open up any doors or bays...
There are a huge number of different arguements from both sides of the table, and from the perspective of each party that wants to play and almost all of them will contain valid points of law and conflict with each other. I would pay money to see the time compressed version of
this courtroom drama, or at least sit through commercials, but somehow
I don't forsee a Law & Order: Trademark Investigations as a viable TV show.
But I do see the point from both sides and it's valid from both sides.
If someone was profiting by a minitureized or photographically reproduced copy of my work without compensating me in any way, I wouldn't be happy about it.
I could ask my trademark lawyers for their opinion, but I really don't want to waste the $450 hr they charge. My bill this year is already high enough ;) .
- References:
- Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- From: dancho
- Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- From: Rufus
- Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- From: Mark Mathu
- Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- From: Rufus
- Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- From: Don Stauffer
- Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- From: Rufus
- Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- From: John McGrail
- Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- From: Don Stauffer
- Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- From: John McGrail
- Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- From: Jeff Barringer
- Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- From: Rufus
- Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- Prev by Date: Re: 1/48th Tucano
- Next by Date: Re: Looking for modeling website
- Previous by thread: Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- Next by thread: Re: Licensing of Model Kits
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|