Re: Hobby Lobby bonanza!

e wrote:
>
> In article <r5qjk1pv5gem2tr7ninlstoge5qb05bumf@xxxxxxx>,
> wrote:
>
> >On Mon, 10 Oct 2005 03:53:59 GMT, noone@xxxxxxxxxxx (e) wrote:
> >
> > <sigh> You did it again... :(
> why did i think i was replying to billy b?
> rorry, al.

Beats the heck out of me. We ain't got no Hobby Lobbies hereabouts!
Now's the time for self-flagellation, 'e'. ;Þ

Bill Banaszak, MFE
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Simple yet Profound Metatheorem
    ... "Various people have asked what the heck this means.": ... "instead of replying with questions.": I had yet to respond to ... > proof of 'P equals Q'." ... >>Computation theorem becomes an Incompleteness theorem in Logic, ...
    (sci.logic)
  • Re: Wishing sth for oneself / for others
    ... it lets us people reading posts know who the heck the writer ... is replying to. ... naively simple world of tree structure to the left on my ...
    (sci.lang.japan)
  • Re: Wishing sth for oneself / for others
    ... it lets us people reading posts know who the heck the writer ... is replying to. ...
    (sci.lang.japan)
  • Re: [Dialog] Newbie
    ... that would be even quicker. ... replying via email to Usenet posters. ... Heck, in all my years I've never ...
    (news.software.readers)
Loading