Re: 20-July-1969... - going back to the moon
- From: Glen Overby <coreSPAMsample@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 25 Jul 2005 10:13:53 -0500
Bob Kaplow <kaplow_r@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>If you look at the USSR/Russian space program, the booster they are using to
>send men to the ISS today is basically the same one they used to launch
>Sputnik 47 years ago. Twice the US space program has ground to a halt after
>accidents. Once we did it to ourselves as we switched from pollo to the
>Shuttle. They've been flying continiously since they started.
That is only Because they (USSR / Russia) don't stop to investigate accidents.
This is a topic that gets beaten to death frequenly on the sci.space.* groups.
The deadly and near-deadly accident list for Soyuz shows that it is not a
safer vehicle than the Shuttle. James Oberg has written extensively about
this topic. While Soyuz has been flying 2-3x as long, it's failure list is
2-3x as long.
Glen
.
- References:
- Re: 20-July-1969... - going back to the moon
- From: tater schuld
- Re: 20-July-1969... - going back to the moon
- From: Bob Kaplow
- Re: 20-July-1969... - going back to the moon
- Prev by Date: Re: ROL NEWS--AeroTech Re-releases D21T Single-Use Motors
- Next by Date: Re: Bulk Qnty. Engines
- Previous by thread: Re: 20-July-1969... - going back to the moon
- Next by thread: Re: 20-July-1969... - going back to the moon
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading