Re: Dope thinner
- From: Ron <ron@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 31 Jul 2007 03:30:42 GMT
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 20:16:51 +0800, Ray Haddad
<rhaddad@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 30 Jul 2007 08:13:24 -0400, I said, "Pick a card, any card"
and "Morgans" <jsmorgan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> instead replied:
"Ray Haddad" <> wrote
Unless the candles and ladders are made from asbestos, they're not
carcinogenic like MEK. Very bad stuff.
Not this again.
ALL you have to do to keep the MEK from being carcinogenic, is to wear
rubber gloves while it is still liquid. When it soaks into your skin, it is
not good for you.
Or inhale it. It's just too nasty for words. Why even use it?
Use it because it works better than anything else on the market. You
just have to be careful and not wash your hands in it.
There's really no need for it with other, safer compounds around.
The trouble with "safer compounds" in general is; they don't work
nearly as well as those they supposedly replace.
Ron
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Dope thinner
- From: Six_O'Clock_High
- Re: Dope thinner
- References:
- Dope thinner
- From: BCRandy
- Re: Dope thinner
- From: Ray Haddad
- Re: Dope thinner
- From: The Natural Philosopher
- Re: Dope thinner
- From: Ray Haddad
- Re: Dope thinner
- From: Morgans
- Re: Dope thinner
- From: Ray Haddad
- Dope thinner
- Prev by Date: Re: alternative push-rod setups for park-flyers?
- Next by Date: Re: RC Airplanes group on Yahoo
- Previous by thread: Re: Dope thinner
- Next by thread: Re: Dope thinner
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|