Re: RCU - R.I.P.

In article <QINpf.6451$Tg2.4945@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Six_O'Clock_High <Six_O'Clock_High@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

| I find it offensive that what is presented by RCU as my text is NOT
| what I have written. That is the position RCU seems to be taking
| today. No longer can one be sure that what is read has anything to
| do with what the author wrote.

Waitaminute ...

I'm not a RCU user. (But I'm familiar with what it is, of course.)

Are you telling us that the moderators (or somebody else) has edited
your own posts for you? Not just removed them, but changed their
content (and I presume, their meaning?)

Usenet looks better and better all the time.


--
Doug McLaren, dougmc@xxxxxxxxxx
Okay, who put a "stop payment" on my reality check?
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Notifier chains are unsafe
    ... why wouldn't it be okay always? ... as long as the notifier doesn't unregister itself ... the critical RCU section for the list walk is only a small part of notifier_call_chain. ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: Notifier chains are unsafe
    ... why wouldn't it be okay always? ... as long as the notifier doesn't unregister itself ... an RCU read-side critical section." ... send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in ...
    (Linux-Kernel)
  • Re: RCU - R.I.P.
    ... That is the position RCU seems to be taking ... Whole threads were recast by moderator editing. ... Yes sir, Usenet with all of its warts is looking better than RCU. ...
    (rec.models.rc.air)