Re: Opinions on GMS and Magnum engines?
- From: Bob Cowell <trash_trap@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Dec 2005 07:25:06 -0600
On Sun, 11 Dec 2005 22:23:43 -0700, "Paul McIntosh" <paul@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
>Bob,
>
>Is yours one of the remote needle models? The Tower version has the same
>characteristic. I have flown several of the standard version GMS engines
>and they all performed very well.
>
>--
>Paul McIntosh
>RC-Bearings.com
>"when steel just isn't enough"
No, It has the needle on the carb.
it performs flawlessly as long as the plane can't move,
set it free, and the troubles begin.
I think the &*^% think has some form of motion sickness
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Opinions on GMS and Magnum engines?
- From: Mark Eastman
- Re: Opinions on GMS and Magnum engines?
- From: Martin X. Moleski, SJ
- Re: Opinions on GMS and Magnum engines?
- References:
- Opinions on GMS and Magnum engines?
- From: \"Doc\"
- Re: Opinions on GMS and Magnum engines?
- From: Bob Cowell
- Re: Opinions on GMS and Magnum engines?
- From: Paul McIntosh
- Opinions on GMS and Magnum engines?
- Prev by Date: Re: Li'l Banchee
- Next by Date: Re: Auto landing systems for large scale model airplanes
- Previous by thread: Re: Opinions on GMS and Magnum engines?
- Next by thread: Re: Opinions on GMS and Magnum engines?
- Index(es):