Re: DCC occupancy detections false positives
- From: Charles Davis <cad@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 17 May 2008 16:48:53 -0400
Old.Professor wrote:
I just installed DCC block occupancy detectors and am getting false
positives only when the layout is in an operating session with lots of
people and trains. When I'm by myself there are no false indications.
I'm at a loss what to do, or how to test if the changes have been
effective.
I'm using a variant on the VT-5 inductive (transformer-type) occupancy
detector (see http://home.cogeco.ca/~rpaisley4/DccBODvt5.html).
Specifically, the variant by Richard Napper is described on page 18 in
http://www.mcor-nmra.org/Publications/Kibitzer/Volume56-2.pdf .
During the operating session I saw the occupancy indication change
from unoccupied to occupied and then back to unoccupied in about 30
seconds. Most of the time it showed occupied when there was nothing
on the track. Now that I'm by myself, it is steadily showing
unoccupied.
You need to check the 'sensitivity'
I.E. a DRY finger across the rails shouldn't trip things, a WET finger should.
I had a thought that there might be stray fields. I was going to try
using aluminum foil to shield the detector, but then I got to
wondering if that would be effective if the fields were magnetic.
There isn't any 'magnetic field' to shield.
Chuck D.
.
Suggestions would be very much appreciated.
I also posed this request to mrrelectronics@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: DCC occupancy detections false positives
- From: Charles Davis
- Re: DCC occupancy detections false positives
- References:
- DCC occupancy detections false positives
- From: Old.Professor
- DCC occupancy detections false positives
- Prev by Date: DCC occupancy detections false positives
- Next by Date: Re: DCC occupancy detections false positives
- Previous by thread: DCC occupancy detections false positives
- Next by thread: Re: DCC occupancy detections false positives
- Index(es):