Re: Netkkkop alert.

Some people deserve to be kopped on. Reference the attached, beginning at
the bottom of page nine.

http://www.kansas.gov/ksag/Files/cp03report.PDF



<Niemadre> wrote in message news:4600fd7a.67392656@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 16:08:01 -0500, newhouse@xxxxxxxxxxxxx (Paul
Newhouse) wrote:

In article <4602f0ee.64181046@xxxxxxxxxxxx>,
Niemadre writes:
On 19 Mar 2007 13:06:04 -0700, "Newyorkcentralfan@xxxxxxxxxxx"
<newyorkcentralfan@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Gee Mark, still up to your old tricks. Using two different email
accounts to post.

People don't post from email accounts you dip***.

Pretty damned arrogant of you to think that anyone has done anything
you needed to be forgiving them for. You're the one who needs to be
asking for forgiveness. You posted under several false names. You even
pretended to be a lawyer. BTW, your state's attorney general was very
interested about that. All I would have needed to do was to make a
formal complaint and they would have hauled your sorry ass in. You're
lucky I was in a charitable mood.

So you're a netkkkop? And a RL kop?

Furthermore, you could have avoided all of these regretable events if
you had just butched up, admitted you had got in over your head with
the painting and offered to send the items back or offered to set a
realistic schedule for their completion.

Whine somemore dip***.

You are either Mark tyring to distract the focus of the thread or you
weren't around for the Mark Mason epiode that is being referenced.
Mark was arrogant then as he is now. Suggesting that others were
responsible for his bad behavior is childishly arrogant on his part.

I don't like twits who kop on people. You can ignore. netkkkops
attract attention of many, wanna see?

Paul




.