Re: IT'S TIME TO ABANDON THIS SANDBOX

David Nebenzahl wrote:

> The idea, I guess, is to get us to squeal like a bunch of schoolgirls
> and run for the protection of the news admins, and beg them for a
> moderated newsgroup.

Moderated how? By whom? And moderated in what sense? No effing and blinding allowed? OT posts not allowed?

How would a bunch of net nerds know what was OT for a model railroad group?

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Why is the 2nd amendment in the Constitution
    ... It's about protection from violent ... just wake up in the morning and decide to go hunting or target shooting. ... They have to satisfy a bunch of extremely sailly rules. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Why is the 2nd amendment in the Constitution
    ... It's about protection from violent ... just wake up in the morning and decide to go hunting or target shooting. ... They have to satisfy a bunch of extremely sailly rules. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Can you create a protected form in part of a document?
    ... "Bobby" wrote: ... a whole bunch of things get disabled. ... >> But note that this will disable certain features in the entire document, ... When businesses invoke the "protection of consumers," it's a lot like ...
    (microsoft.public.word.docmanagement)
  • Re: Why is the 2nd amendment in the Constitution
    ... It's about protection from violent ... just wake up in the morning and decide to go hunting or target shooting. ... They have to satisfy a bunch of extremely sailly rules. ...
    (talk.politics.guns)
  • Re: Decompile .NET
    ... "obfuscator", you should find a bunch of options like these: ... protection from reverse engineering (i.e. it's still possible to crack ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
Loading