Re: Digital cameras & depth of field (my experience)
- From: "video guy - www.locoworks.com" <videochas@xxxxxxx>
- Date: 21 Dec 2005 12:44:09 -0800
Dan, come back to earth. We are talking photography here, not rocket
science. I give you this quote from
http://www.pinhole.org/about/index.cfm (which you would do well to
visit).
"Pinhole images are formed by a beam of light, the diameter of which
governs its sharpness. The diameter of the beam is determined by the
diameter of the pinhole...so, a really big pinhole will make a less
sharp image and a very small pinhole will make a very sharp; but not as
sharp as a lens, image."
The pictures on exhibit in the gallery there are quite amazing.
Dimensions, relative f-stops, and other detail are available there too.
And by the way, I made a pretty good living with that antiquated
ray-optics for thirty years. I shall not desert it now!
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Digital cameras & depth of field (my experience)
- From: Daniel A. Mitchell
- Re: Digital cameras & depth of field (my experience)
- References:
- Digital cameras & depth of field (my experience)
- From: David Emery
- Re: Digital cameras & depth of field (my experience)
- From: David Nebenzahl
- Re: Digital cameras & depth of field (my experience)
- From: CNJ999
- Re: Digital cameras & depth of field (my experience)
- From: video guy - www.locoworks.com
- Re: Digital cameras & depth of field (my experience)
- From: Daniel A. Mitchell
- Re: Digital cameras & depth of field (my experience)
- From: video guy - www.locoworks.com
- Re: Digital cameras & depth of field (my experience)
- From: Daniel A. Mitchell
- Digital cameras & depth of field (my experience)
- Prev by Date: Re: Feeder wires
- Next by Date: Re: Feeder wires
- Previous by thread: Re: Digital cameras & depth of field (my experience)
- Next by thread: Re: Digital cameras & depth of field (my experience)
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|