Re: Who here is capable of a rational discussion of Chi?

On Dec 17, 8:59 pm, GreenDistantStar
<pde63539removet...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Renli wrote:
On Dec 17, 2:55 pm, GreenDistantStar
<pde63539removet...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Renli wrote:
On Dec 16, 11:42 pm, Mike <mkornecki2...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Dec 15, 5:16 pm, "Chas" <chascleme...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
I want to avoid semantics.<<<<
I was talking about Ollie/phraud
Phraud isn't a joke. It wasn't meant to be funny. It makes and
reinforces a point. He is a charlatan who is tryying to get google
hits so that he can dupe others out of 50 bucks. He wants to 'become'
a net authority.
That's a bold faced lie, where am I charging money?
You've made attempts to charge for your 'services' in previous posts.

What services in particular?

You have forgotten?

And still, fraud? That would require a willful deception.

I'll take your word for that....

  As you've

already professed yourself that I believe in what I am saying, if it
turns out I'm wrong, it certainly does not amount to willful
deception. By your own admission I'm not a fraud. So try lightening
the *** up ehh?

It's ok to spruik your wares, and it's even ok for charge for
them....but first ya gotta have something to sell, eh?

Is it really necessary for me to reiterate them....have you forgotten?

No, you remember - you can't read.

Anyone can read the Google archive...it's all there. Who are you trying
to convince?

So yes, you should probably go and
reiterate them so I can show you the error of logic associated with
your above stated error of fact.

So you really don't remember trying to flog your 'knowledge' to me and
others for $50?

Because I feel you're annoying and it was fun to ridicule you and tell
you that you would not learn anything from me until you paid me $50.

And yet, I am so willing to tell someone like Don Wagner everything
for free.

In fact I made the offer intially for free - to explain it to anyone,
in private. And I have spent so much of my free time giving - in so
many ways.

That I said at one point you must pay me $50 only means I called you
on your bull*** - I proved that to you this subject is not only
worthless it is less than that. And, as a result, you have no
credibility on this issue. You simply have no dog in the fight,
therefore when it comes to chi you and your opinion are completely
worthless.

-
.