Re: No Chickenhawks here
- From: hal@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:25:51 -0600
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 17:26:36 -0400, "David L. Burkhead"
<dburkhead@xxxxxxx> wrote:
<hal@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:4apgb41ppn59sim9k94m5d4ssvtin3ffvo@xxxxxxxxxx
On Fri, 29 Aug 2008 16:55:19 -0400, "David L. Burkhead"and
<dburkhead@xxxxxxx> wrote:
Okay,
So aside from her being a woman, why do you hate her?
(Sound familiar? I'm mimicking you back when Hillary was in the running
POTUSyou kept getting answers as to why people did not want to see her as
and you kept coming back with the "aside from her being a woman....")
And she _still_ has more experience than Obama.
but Obama has a brain.
At least as much as a the average parrot. Evidence of much more than that
is decidedly lacking.
Repeating "hope, change" over and over again is _not_ a sign of
intelligence.
Nor is "57 states." Nor is "I'll be working with them for 8-10 years." Nor
is talking "hope, change" and then picking the quintessential example of
"business as usual in Washington" as his running mate.
Frankly, he's a post turtle.
and you think a geezer, one step away from death, who's claim to fame
is crashing Navy jets, and who doesn't know the difference between
Sunnis and Shiites, and a soccer mom who's claim to fame is mayor of a
town of 9,000? At least Obama was smart enough to tap a #2 who had
experience and guts.
Hal
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: No Chickenhawks here
- From: travisgod@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Re: No Chickenhawks here
- From: David L. Burkhead
- Re: No Chickenhawks here
- References:
- No Chickenhawks here
- From: David L. Burkhead
- Re: No Chickenhawks here
- From: David L. Burkhead
- Re: No Chickenhawks here
- From: hal
- Re: No Chickenhawks here
- From: David L. Burkhead
- No Chickenhawks here
- Prev by Date: Re: No Chickenhawks here
- Next by Date: Re: The Judo of Tai Chi research, con't.
- Previous by thread: Re: No Chickenhawks here
- Next by thread: Re: No Chickenhawks here
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|