Re: Three men make a tiger
- From: "Jerry B. Altzman" <jbaltz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 31 Jul 2008 15:29:38 GMT
on 2008-07-31 11:08 hal@xxxxxxxxxx said the following:
there is nothing absurd about chi.
You keep on using this word (chi). I do not think it means what you think it means.
and you would know nothing about being rational
p/q, where p and q are integers, and q is nonzero. What's the problem here?
Are you going to make a claim that chi is non-algebraic?
Hal
//jbaltz
--
jerry b. altzman jbaltz@xxxxxxxxxxx www.jbaltz.com
thank you for contributing to the heat death of the universe.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Three men make a tiger
- From: hal
- Re: Three men make a tiger
- References:
- Three men make a tiger
- From: hal
- Re: Three men make a tiger
- From: shuurai11
- Re: Three men make a tiger
- From: hal
- Three men make a tiger
- Prev by Date: Re: Shuurai will now provide the proof: Re: Underarm deodorant in the Dojo
- Next by Date: Re: Falsifiability & the Chi FAQ
- Previous by thread: Re: Three men make a tiger
- Next by thread: Re: Three men make a tiger
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|