Re: Generating electricity?
- From: Mike <mkornecki2000@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2008 08:30:19 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 22, 9:27 pm, "Jerry B. Altzman" <jba...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
The IPCC report was carefully edited and the data filtered. Certain
opinions were ignored.
http://www.sciencealert.com.au/opinions/20081007-17643.html
The UN climate change numbers hoax
Thursday, 10 July 2008
Perhaps you should petition your own professional organization for a new
policy position:http://www.aps.org/policy/statements/07_1.cfm
quote:
I am not certain as to the level of sincerity of your statement.
Perhaps you are just using it as an intro to the statement by the APS.
I do not believe that the APS leadership has ever shown a willingness
to respond to petitions?
I believe that the policy statement has been heavily influenced, by
among other things the IPCC report. Evidence is mounting regarding the
biases used by the IPCC. It is even recorded, by the IPCC on many
occasions.
"Incontrovertible" is a pretty strong statement for a physicist to make.
It is indeed. Extreme language such as that also makes me suspicious
about the intent beind the statement. When is the last time you saw a
physicist use such a term to describe *any* theory, even Maxwell's?
-Mike K.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Generating electricity?
- From: Jerry B. Altzman
- Re: Generating electricity?
- References:
- Generating electricity?
- From: David O'Daniel
- Re: Generating electricity?
- From: Mark Goldberg
- Re: Generating electricity?
- From: hal
- Re: Generating electricity?
- From: shuurai11
- Re: Generating electricity?
- From: hal
- Re: Generating electricity?
- From: Mike
- Re: Generating electricity?
- From: hal
- Re: Generating electricity?
- From: Mike
- Re: Generating electricity?
- From: Jerry B. Altzman
- Generating electricity?
- Prev by Date: Re: Extend your chi
- Next by Date: Re: Extend your chi
- Previous by thread: Re: Generating electricity?
- Next by thread: Re: Generating electricity?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|