Re: Joe Horn Cleared by Grand Jury in shootings

"Herbert Cannon" <hcannon18@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:MDWak.12427$rH1.9579@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Wayne Dobson" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hJVak.180460$Ek2.129677@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Herbert Cannon" <hcannon18@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:blUak.11971$F97.3293@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Summary execution is what it is. You make China look like a wussy
democracy.

Nah, China shoots a lot more criminals.

Would that have anything to do with it having four times the
population? Hmmm...

Yeah; but, I bet they still beat us on a per capita basis.

You guess. Hmmm...

And you guess.

Nah, I looked it up. Because I'm able to read, I can do that.

I am so happy for you. Too bad you cannot comprehend what you read.

Too bad you can't read.

China does
execute more criminals, but also has half the rate of homicides as the
U.S. Good to see that you guys have things the right way around.

Damn I hate not being first in everything.

Yeah, you'd be first in line if they were handing out ***
sandwiches.

They gonna make sandwhiches out of your brain and hand them out?

Actually, they wanted to make the filling from your brain, but they
thought it would be too much trouble to have to send up a rocket to
pluck it out of geostationary orbit.

Actually they wanted to make the filling from your brain but they
discovered you never had one.

Yes, the found much more success in finding you with *** for brains.

Too bad you dont even have a brain; then you would know I dont have ***
for brains.

Anyhow, shooting in the back is always despised by anyone with any
moral standard.

Always cheat always win. I suppose you are going to tell them to
pull out their gun and take the first shot at you, moron.

That's a lame excuse. You can't lawfully kill someone because they
might have a gun

Oh yes you can.

The laws are somewhat different, outside of your padded cell.

You are the one with the imaginary laws.

You are functionally illiterate, so you wouldn't know what that
complicated writing that you deleted because it made your head spin was
about.

Try some writing comprehension too.

and that they might try to shoot you with the gun which you
supposed them to have.

Oh yes you can.

Did the voices tell you that?

No a Texas Grand Jury did.

Wisely, they held the hearing in private.

Nope it was pretty public. It involved a case of a fellow shooting his
girl friend in the back of the head in a mall parking lot. Another fellow
who was on his way to the rifle range then shot the miscreant as he was
running away. He did not know that the miscreant had dropped the gun.
Texas Jury came back with a no true bill. I knew a lot of lawyers that
thought that was just terrible. They remind me of you - they were full
of *** too.

Dumbass! That just means that they refused to initiate criminal
proceedings. Due to your inability to form an independant thought, your
lack of comprehension and your illiteracy, you are oblivious to the fact
that people in Texans are only getting away with such things because that
State refuses to prosecute such cases. Legal precedence is what determines
how the law is interpreted, not historical blind-eye turning, you uneducated
ass!

You think you're fucking John
Wayne.

Compared to me John Wayne was a ***.

I wonder how tough you are without your keyboard.

You imagine you can execute anyone for any crime.

Anyone who is breaking into my house to steal stuff. Would you like to
test me? I am an excellent shot.

You're very brave behind a keyboard. For one thing, I don't break into
people's homes. But say I did choose to break into yours, the first thing
I'd take out is you. You're very brave regarding something you've never
faced and something you don't expect to happen. Ass.

I recall a story
of a householder in Texas shooting dead a teenager stealing a hubcap, and
getting away with it. You must be very proud.

You must be very stupid. First I rather doubt that your " story " is much
more than a figment of your overwrought imagination.

You goldfish never learn. The same thing happens over and over again to
you, but each time it's like a new experience. That case occured in your
State, under your own nose. You are clearly walking around in a coma.

I am supposed to cry because some teen was stupid enough to get shot. I
have a simple clue for you. Dont steal. It is frowned upon here.

So is spitting in the street. You execute people for that, too?

I know a cop here who went out into his carport and two thugs took a shot
at him. Guess what they lost the gun fight. He had a pump shotgun and shot
them. If you think real hard for six months you may get the point.

I know of a dumbass who raised an irrelevant case in a misguided attempt to
bolster an untenable position. Think on that.
..
Yeah, you moron, their hands were just loaded with food when they
were caught. Two illegals with a long criminal records.

Of course he knew all that. Maybe you should lobby for a three
strikes and you're out cold on a slab law.

That would either cut crime or save a lot of money woudnt it.

It seems a bit excessive.

If you are a criminal.

It wouldn't seem excessive if you're a murderer.

Oh you are going to allow a murderer three strikes? How magnanimous of
you.

You people allow them at least one strike.

We used to have laws like that, where you could
get hung for stealing a loaf of bread.

Gee was that just yesterday?

As an aside, the reason that hanging
was finally abolished was that it caused too much traffic congestion.

Did your buggy bog down?

At
least that's what I heard. It didn't stop people from stealing.

Oh my you have zombie bread thieves that kept right on stealing.

Do you know of any solution to anything which doesn't involve killing as
many people as possible? It doesn't seem so.

Do you always walk around with your head stuck up all the way up your ass.
It does seem so.

You are wonderfully oblivious to your own ignorance. You must keep really
stupid company.

That is what we call hardened criminals down here. Sorry, Dumbo,
people get tired of being victims because of feel good idiots like
you defending criminals.

The ruling looks like an incorrect interpretation of the law.

The ruling is a very correct interpretation of the law. 1. Texas
passed a law that said you could use lethal force to stop someone from
stealing your property ( most states dont have that law).

It wasn't his property.

Did not have to be.

It does have to be. If you could read, you'd have known that.

I read it maybe you should read it again.

Yeah? Then explain it.

*Tumbleweed 1*

*Tumbleweed 2*

*Tumbleweed 3*

A Texas Grand Jury read it too.

That's why they wisely see to it that such cases never get contested so as
to set unfortunate precedent.

You lose again. Next time read the words and not what you want them to
say.

You're a monkey. You ape, without understanding what you are aping.

2. He ordered them to stop and told them if they moved they were dead.

That shows premeditation.

You really have never been through any defensive shooting classes have
you? It tells every witness they had a chance to stop, dumbass, and did
not.

The killing was unlawful.

Bull*** and so said the Texas Grand Jury.

If the case had gone to court and the matter had been pressed, they would
have lost, causing all sorts of unpleasent ructions. They wisely stonewall
all such cases.

Answer the fucking question *** have you ever been through a defensive
shooting class? I rather doubt you have shot anything off other than your
loud mouth.

Go study your own laws and stop talking like a crack-head.

3. They started moving - at that moment he was safe to assume his life
was at risk ( the old action beats reaction thing - I will give you a
shotgun and let you point at me and turn my back on you- If I have a
gun in my hand I can spin and put three bullets in you before you can
even think about pulling the trigger even though you already have the
drop on me). They should have frozen when he told them to.

All of that is bull***.

You are hopelessly dense and way over your head in a subject you know
nothing about.

You are a parrot.

You really are stupid.

Go off and ask a competent lawyer and get back here with
the answer, instead of forming your opinions based on a pronouncement
from a poorly educated vigilante redneck.

Oh you mean like the lawyer Joe Horn had?

No! An independant lawyer, ***.

He won the case - you lost again, loser.

Can someone please point out to this dumbass that the case was never
contested.

He was in no fear for his life; he decided he'd
very likely kill them before he confronted them.

You are clairvoyant Whane?

He said he was going to kill them, Herbot.

He said " Dont move or you are dead." What is you cannot comprehend Whiny
Whane? The "Dont" or the "move"? Is that too big a sentence for you to
comprehend? You seem to be having a lot of trouble with your reading
comprehension.

Do you eat dirt? Is it a mineral deficiency that makes you this stupid?

Here is a clue for you, if someone should say that to you in Texas when
you are robbing a house - best you dont move. Think you can comprehend
that? If not, plan on someone blowing your ass off and getting a no true
bill from the Grand Jury. In fact in your case they may give the fellow a
medal.

You have the lawless sentiments of a criminal. You sanction everything from
summary in-justice to looting and mass murder. There's something really
wrong with you.

4. They were criminals caught in a criminal act. They got themselves
killed - no one else did it to them.

It still wasn't a lawful act.

The Texas Grand Jury said it was, dumbass.

Get an education. You're embarrassing yourself.

I did. You have already embarrassed yourself with your stupidity. You are
not capable of being educated.

You misspelt "indoctrinated." Do you salivate *every* time a bell rings?

The reason so many innocents get hurt is they dont realize that when
they confront evil intent they must act really fast and not go into
denial. Joe Horn acted.

I thought of asking you which law you were referring to, but I
concluded that it would be beyond you.

What is now obvious is that you cannot even read and comprehend what
you quoted. Good thing the Texas Grand Jury can.

Basically, relating to this case,

You are unable to relate to this case.

It was empathy, not the law which protected this yahoo.

Not the way I read it nor the Texas Grand Jury. You lose, loser.

If the Texas Grand Jury told you that dog *** was caviar, you'd eat it.

But the Texas Grand Jury would not do that now would they whiny Whane.
They have far more smarts than you. In fact you have none.

That's all that saves you from having to eat dog ***.

What you have to say is of no consequence.

You are really stupid. The Texas Grand Jury told you take your hug a thug
program and shove it up your inconsequential ass. You lost you are just
too stupid to realize it.

Yeah, your State has a real handle on the menace of hubcap theft. BTW you
have more than thee times the homicide rate of England & Wales, and nearly
three times that of China, by the most recent reckoning. It gets better,
doesn't it?

--
Wayne Dobson
AKA "Dobbie The House Elf"


.

Loading