Re: The Chi FAQ section 2: Is Chi a Scientific Theory?
- From: Mike <mkornecki2000@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 29 Feb 2008 04:48:34 -0800 (PST)
On Feb 29, 2:01 am, Renli <oliver.rich...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Does it mean "inconceivable"?
'Cause that's what I think of every time I see Oliver write it...
Maybe you are just un-educated as to the context of the quote. Please
see the chi faq for the complete quote.
Who wants to read a phaq that was put together by a simpleton who
doesn't understand the basis of logical thought?
-Mike K.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- The Chi FAQ section 2: Is Chi a Scientific Theory?
- From: Renli
- Re: The Chi FAQ section 2: Is Chi a Scientific Theory?
- From: David L. Burkhead
- Re: The Chi FAQ section 2: Is Chi a Scientific Theory?
- From: Renli
- Re: The Chi FAQ section 2: Is Chi a Scientific Theory?
- From: Don Geddis
- Re: The Chi FAQ section 2: Is Chi a Scientific Theory?
- From: Renli
- The Chi FAQ section 2: Is Chi a Scientific Theory?
- Prev by Date: Re: Force/Power + CHI
- Next by Date: Re: The Chi FAQ section 2: Is Chi a Scientific Theory?
- Previous by thread: Re: The Chi FAQ section 2: Is Chi a Scientific Theory?
- Next by thread: Re: The Chi FAQ section 2: Is Chi a Scientific Theory?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|