Re: To ponder: Bellfield murder trial over

"Herbert Cannon" <hcannon18@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:WBnxj.8512$f8.3937@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

"Wayne Dobson" <nospam@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:F_hxj.142488$LD6.120621@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"Herbert Cannon" <hcannon18@xxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:L7dxj.58362$Ft5.58110@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

I said to pay note of your instincts; not that they are always
correct. Instincts tend to improve the more they are noted.

Oh I see now you wish to equivocate. OK equivocate away.

I haven't said anything ambiguous.

No you just equivocated.

No, I am not to blame for your confusion.

I am not confused.

Then stop acting confused.

Something told you that I meant more
than I did; probably your instincts.

They cannot read.

That makes two of you.

There is only one of me. You are having trouble counting.

As for me I will trust my instincts.

Yeah, good luck with that.

Well it has worked for many many years so you should use the past tense
there.

You don't live in a hostile enough environment to suggest that it is your
wits that brought you through.

Past tense - lived through hostile environments.

If you are talking about the kind of environment where you are at liberty to
shoot anyone wearing clothes different from your own, that doesn't count.

Only fools like you think of living in them.

I didn't choose the environment that I speak of.

Hope you make it here, I am beggining to have severe doubts about that.

Yet I'm still in good health, despite your doubts.

Your radar is only good if you're clean of too many prejudices.

What bullshit are you spouting?

Prejudices are preformed ideas which compete with your instincts.

Prejudices are wisdom.

No, they are judgements pre or prior to sufficient evidence, leading to
unreliable and erroneous conclusions.

Or they could be educated instincts fromed on sufficient evidence
leading to reliable and corredt conclusions.

Prejudice is by definition, opinions formed without reference to
evidence.


They could be either.

Not so.

If you
have too many of them, your instincts are drowned out and rendered
useless.

How many is too many?

When you find yourself frequently blindsided by events; whatever number
you're up to, that's the number.

I will take that as - I dont know the answer.

There is no magic number.

Well, Duh, if you are the Grand Dragon you have a problem. Otherwise
dont wander around the 9th ward in New Orleans.

That's something of a no-brainer.

Yes that is why I stated it for you.

If you need help with that, you probably
don't belong in the gene pool.

I was helping you.

You were trying. Actually, you need the help.

Actually, I need no help and least of all from you.

You probably don't, as you don't have to face the scenarios that you claim
such a sound understanding of.

If you had a clue you would see how it tied in with a woman feeling
guilty at a valid reason to feel anxious.

She felt guilty cause she was a fool liberal who wanted to believe the
world is full of sweetness and light. I knew her and I told her to go
get the book " The Gift of Fear" before she did something really
stupid.

She was also operating out of prejudice and not paying attention to
what her accumulated wisdom was telling her.

She was operating out of stupidity and nothing more.

She was basing her actions on invalid conditioning, rather than valid
instincts.

It has nothing to do with her instincts.

The fact that she had valid instincts which she ignored, is pertinent to
the discussion. But I'll understand if you wish to dismiss it, as it
erodes your argument.

Apparently you understand nothing as is usual with you.

The Emperor's New Clothes.

Paranoia is a spanner in the works of instincts.

Just cause you are paranoid does not mean they are not after you.

Correct. It means nothing. It's in your head and has no bearing on
reality.

That was joke, Wayne.

But it addressed a point.

Really?

Really.

No not really - you tried to address a joke which makes your address a
real joke.

Next time, I won't address anything to you.

--
Wayne Dobson
AKA "Dobbie The House Elf"


.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: To ponder: Bellfield murder trial over
    ... Oh I see now you wish to equivocate. ... Prejudices are preformed ideas which compete with your instincts. ... That was joke, Wayne. ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: To ponder: Bellfield murder trial over
    ... I said to pay note of your instincts; not that they are always correct. ... Oh I see now you wish to equivocate. ... Prejudices are preformed ideas which compete with your instincts. ... She was operating out of stupidity and nothing more. ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: To ponder: Bellfield murder trial over
    ... Oh I see now you wish to equivocate. ... Prejudices are preformed ideas which compete with your instincts. ... Or they could be educated instincts fromed on sufficient evidence leading ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: To ponder: Bellfield murder trial over
    ... When your gut tells you something is wrong - it is wrong. ... I said to pay note of your instincts; not that they are always correct. ... Oh I see now you wish to equivocate. ... Prejudices are preformed ideas which compete with your instincts. ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: Gettier Problems
    ... >> survival.....genetic changes also occurred when the environment ... Of course each of the instincts ... mankind would not be able to adapt to many of the earths moods....we ... > simpler adaptations of preliterate human beings. ...
    (sci.logic)