Re: RMA is dying


considering the pack mentality here clearly only a couple of you
fucked it up and the rest didn't even bother to consider what I was
actually saying.

Wrong, Hal - several people corrected you after they considered what
you wrote and determined that it was bull***.

Ah, yes, of course, more vague references while avoiding the point.
Bull***.  "several people".   Argumentum ad populum.  

No, idiot - a direct response to your above claim that nobody "even
bothered to consider" what you were saying. You really need to stop
with the logical fallacy bull***; you understand them as little as
anything else, and all you end up doing is detracting from an already
worthless position.


You are deliberately mis-stating Kirk's hypothesis.  What Kirk was
talking about was using data like handedness, preferred lead, and
"tells" to determine what direction a fighter would move.  It was
never about predicting a truly random event.

and I explain to him and you that there was no such reliable data to
be able to determine a pattern and it would simply be a random guess,
therefore you most likely would be wrong half the time.  Please wipe
off the drool and try to pretend you get it.

You were wrong then and you're wrong now; it is not a random guess.

And if we were talking about some random event like a coin toss, you
would be on to something.  You'd still be completely out in left field
in terms of your understanding; but you'd at least be in the right
city.  As it stands, you missed the game entirely.

the whole point is you don't know.  You do not have adequate data to
be able to establish a pattern therefore randomness takes over.
Randomness gives you a 50% chance of being wrong.

The data would be inadequate for someone like you with no experience;
we were talking about how a *fighter* would use the data.
.

Loading