Re: Survey says: a million dead

On Jan 31, 3:34 pm, h...@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
the ORB study as did Lancet compared present death rates with rates
prior to the invasion and correctly concluded the drastic increase was
because of the war.  

Your pathetic dredge of the crapola Lancet report does nothing but
further illustrate the shortcomings of the ORB report.

The lancet report has been discredited almost as much as you have.

 The
NEJM clearly set out to lower the numbers for political purposes,

The New England Journal of Medicine? Do yo ureally wantto say that,
you loon?
HAHAHAHA!

The Soros report was objective I suppose :)

and their lengthy, rambling obfuscations and bull*** shows how severely
flawed their study is.

Lengthy? Obfuscations? Hardly.

the data to support that.  The ORB study simply found a 20% yes rate
to death by violence questions and estimated based on total
population.  Very straight forward and clear.  And all you ever did
was insist it was flawed, but never proved it was and why.

For the very same reasons the Lancet report was flawed. This has been
pointed out to you numerous times.

 The reams
of obfuscatory bull*** heaped upon the NEJM article proves they are

Hahahahaha ... reams. Just because you don't understand harder than
counting over 3 ...

Want to try again?

-Mike K.

P.S. And just for kicks, I'll paste down the great illustration that
shows but ONE stupidity of the ORB report which you ignored.

"My poor brother Akmid, he died because of the Americans!!!!"


Q:"Oh that's terrible, how did he die?"
A: "I don't know. A curse upon those Americans!"


.

Quantcast