Re: $10,000 gold

On Jan 31, 9:54 am, "Greendistantstar"
<pde63539removet...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Heh. This was a test, Peter, and you failed the test.

Pathetic, just plain pathetic.

(1,401 + 1,454 + 4,759)*2 = 15,228

LOL.. You stupid fool. Not only were you NOT FAMILIAR with the article
in the first place, which just goes to show how OUT OF TOUCH you are
with what I am talking about - but you fire back here with that stupid
math trick saying "I didn't even bother to read the original article"
- trumpeting your desire to remain ignorant.

You simply accepted what was fed to you....no critical thinking whatsoever.

Classic projection. Go read the charticle Peter.

Anyway, it's payday on Friday, so you'll be able to afford the what, eight bucks
(?) for the book I recommended.

And you're the master of budgetting???......hahahahaha!!!

Dude, if you can't afford to pay for this book with your loose change, what on
earth do you think entitles you to provide investment advice?

Because I'm self-evidently right, Peter. For the umpteenth time you're
simply wrong; you spend far too much time trying to find something
wrong with what people say.

Go read the articles I gave you and you will (maybe) figure it out.
Until then, you should probably stop trying to discuss the precious
metals markets and related with me - just as you wouldn't discuss the
finer points of lawyerism with trav. I mean hey, I am open to
discussing it, but if you continually get things this wrong and don't
even bother to check your sources - what's the point?

-
.