Re: OT - House Approves Sexual Discrimination Bill

Herbert Cannon wrote:
"suds mcduff" <sudsmcduff@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:IEZZi.3793$qv5.2906@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Herbert Cannon wrote:
If you are running around calling fags fairies at work, I would say you are having some trouble understanding them.
----Yawn.Once again your lack of reading comprehension lengthens a thread. Where did I say I was calling people *fairies* at work?
"Nah. Most of the gays I know who are out don't mind if you call them
'fairies' if they're effeminate."

Oh you know them from frequenting gay bars?
----Nah. Met a couple in my day, got a cousin who's gay.
Maybe this is just another one
of your overgeneralizations like the terrible problems of troops being forced to convert to Christianity. What was the terrible problem there about .0003% of the troops?
---You mean the thousands of documented cases where you and your "military buddies" claimed none?


http://www.navytimes.com/community/opinion/airforce_opinion_dorr_070827/


http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/la-oe-aslan22aug22,0,4674900.story?coll=la-opinion-center

http://www.truthout.org/docs_2006/082407R.shtml

http://www.truthdig.com/report/print/20071107_the_cancer_from_within/

No I mean actual numbers not a bunch of wordy overblown editorials from liberal rags.

----Navy Times, liberal rag.What a kook you are, Blerbert.

Hell one guy objected to the use of the word warriors at the
Air Force Academy. He has war mixed up with the peace corps.



What's with all these political screeds you post on that anyway. You jealous of something?
---Nah. You and Goldie are the politicos on a martial arts newsgroup, undoubtedly afraid to have your head handed to you in a true political junkie newsgroup.


That's funny cause I have not seen you post anything but politics here lately.

----You must be blind then, idiot. Look into the American Jujitsu thread.

Typical liberal. It is ok for me to do it; but not anyone else.

----9/10 times I'm replying to *your* trolls....


Even so, it's only harrassment if the victim is offended. It's clear in my reply that they wouldn't be.
Utter bull***. Let me tell you tale about a lady here.
---So, you have one anecdote, wherein I have to sit through and sign off on harrassment seminars every year.

Yes one costing $500,000. That ought to be enough.

----You are truly an ignoramus.....

For three years she
was one of the boys at State Police just another Trooper. Told dirty jokes with the rest of them. Then she sued. She walked off with $500, 000 smackers.
----Do you have a cite for this, or is it from the Cannon memory book....

Oh for crips sake do you really think I made that *** up, goofy.

----Where's the site? Methinks you got your facts wrong....


You never know whether or not the person if offended. Therefore,
drop the word from your vocabualry when referring to them. That's a freebie tip. Otherwise you will wind up like Imus. Nothing like getting bit by your own dog.
---You're a dope. The victim has to protest the harassment, and it has to be ongoing afterward, for there to be grounds for harassment. You can't get fired if you ask a woman out, ect....
The state had an incompetent lawyer, or, *you* have your facts wrong.


I used to work in that field for a long time. I am no dope. It is morons like you that cost the organizaton big bucks because they are too thick headed to listen. So go screw yourself. I dont care.

----Wahhhh!!! Crybaby Burbie wanna bottle!

How do you think this is going to play in the workplace with the workers? Hmmmmm? A drag queen for a boss that would be the perfect irony.
----As long as he/she signs my checks......
Gee you are easy.
----Yup. What does it matter that the guy's a she male, if he's a good boss?
I am sure a male, who is so screwed up in the head he has to dress up like a drag queen, is going to make an excellent boss.
----And, what does it matter if he/she is a good boss? Are you going to answer the question, or spin some more?

If you cant figure it out for yourself there is no use in me trying to do it for you.
---It's as I thought, you're completely lacking in common sense.Answer the question, don't run.......

If I need to answer the question for you, you are completely lacking in common sense.

----Run away, Blurbie, run away.....


You probably think he would
make an excellent Marine DI too.
----With all these Repubs being caught out as closet queens, it wouldn't surprise me in the least.
All? You mean Craig.
----Haggert, Foley, and those yet to be outed. I think they said the Senate minority leaders' a little light in the loafers, he might be next. I place odds the Karl Rove's a three dollar bill as well.

Pooh all you can do is speculate. How trashy of you.

----I'm sure there's a web site listing all the queer Repubs....look it up. Scared?

What's next - no discrimination against
those poor pedophiles?
----Pedophilia is a crime.
That is exactly the point - changing the laws and introducing new ones.
---Where is cross dressing a crime? You think that oral sex (hetero) and interracial marriage should be illegal?

It certainly was not a crime to fire a tutu dresser until the Democraps came along.
----Nobody should be fired unless they can't do their job or commit a crime.

Really. Since when did the government have the right to become so intrusive on privately owned business. Did they build the firm, sweat to make it prosperous, meet the payroll everytime, have countless sleepless nights worrying about what business decisions to make, watch their market share go down from the competition and have to adust. You never did run a build a company, run and enterprise, or meet a payroll did you? You are just another addled headed liberal fool, who thinks he should be able to tell the world how to operate even though you are not responible for the workings. So McStupid if I dont want a tutu dressing moron in my firm I should not have to have one.
Is cross dressing? Where? Red states?

Well you have everyone in tutus already in the Blue States. This is going to really play well with blue collar workers.
---Where is cross dressing illegal on par with pedophilia?

Where did I day it was? What I said was that would be probably next on your agenda.

----Speculating again? How trashy of you, hypocrite.....

Trying to make it so.
The ratings of congress are about to tank again.
---While Bush heads for Nixon territory......
Hell Congress is already past that territory
-----Congress is made up of at least two parties...

Congress is dominated by one.
----Nonsense. Dems don't have the votes to override vetos......yet.Repubs congressional ratings are just as bad.

So what. That did not tank their ratings.
----Repubs are marching in lockstep with jr, blocking the Dems from passing popular legislation.
Oh horse ***.

----It's true. Bush has vetoed every progressive effort to date, and the Repubs have lock stepped behind him. The Dems need 60 votes tgo override.

You mean every retrogressive effort; and it is not true because the water bill just passed.

You shot yourself in the foot. Cant blame everything on
Bushies and the Repubs. Getting trite to do so.
----Actually, the Dem congress is unpopular with libs because they're *too* centrist. They want impeachment, defund Iraq, ect.

Listen you fool the country is still pretty conservative. Liberals do not account for stats that low.

---All the polls indicate otherwise, dope....


We'll see come election time, won't we?
Portray the Repubs as obstructionists vi-a-vis Iraq, health care, ect, and we may see a permanent Dem majority......
only then can the country begin to progress......
Tch tch. Retrogress. Must be why congress decided not to work on Fridays. Have to go home and patch up some fences.
---You don't think Congressmen should stay in touch with their districts except when running for re-election?

Particularly when they are so out of touch?

----Can't have it both ways, Derb.....


Finally caught on that the ratings
were in the cellar and no one was buying excuses.
83% of the American people think if you give the govt more money it will waste it.

----Cite?

The Economist. August 11 to 17. Look it up. Front page title " Is America Turning Left." What is that all you can do is say "cite," " cite" " cite?"
Cmon Dud you are supposed to so politically savvy. Get with the program. Start reading some political stuff instead of stuffing your head with left wing slogans.

----Well, sure, as soon as I see you in a political newsgroup......chicken***.


Out trots Wrangel with the mother of all tax increases. Yup tax
and spend. Solve the problem by throwing money at it.
---What was the tax rate of the top 10% during WW2?

How much % do the top 10% pay now?

Tell me how we cut taxes during WW2.

Are we in WW II?

----Are we in *two* wars?


Tell me how we'll fund the govt with no money.

Fund less of it. We will be better off. The more you feed govt the more it eats.

---Who will pay for the govt administration. Voluntary congressmen?
How bout the CDC? FDA?


Tell me how we'll pat the police and EMT's with no money.

Local taxes not federal.

----Oh, you only approve of local taxes? How convenient.....


Tell me how we build roads, ports and bridges with no money......

We need more ports where? We are spinning our wheels with roads. More roads, more vehicles, more fossil fuel burned.

----Uh, Derb, the infrastucture still needs to be maintained and added on to..

Gore is not going to like you. Wrong
arguments Dud.

----How will we find energy alternatives w/o govt funding? Good point, Blurb....


Tell how much the wealthy already pay in taxes.

----Not enough....


Look it up. Pop your bubble.
I have a news flash for you. In this country, we rebuilt San Francisco without FEMA, we rebuilt Galveston without FEMA, we rebuilt businesses, families and housing in this state without FEMA. How did we do all that? We survived without Medicare quite well. We looked after each other.

----This ain't the 19th century, dope, and all your wishin and dreamin ain't gonna make it so.....

Police and EMTs are locally paid.

----Through taxes, and they receive fed subsidies...

The federal govt should *** out there.


>snip long winded, predictable anti govt rants>
.

Loading