Re: Dilbert on Ahmadinejad

Mark Goldberg <msgoldberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:zTrKi.446$hP.236@xxxxxxxxxxxx:

Your only recourse is to call everyone a nut.

There are nuts on both sides, but not everyone is a nut.


Islam was not necessarily any better, but in its heyday, Islam was
the most relatively tolerant of the three religions.

It was entirely intolerant, entirely combative, oppressive, entirely
conquering, and entirely different that the other two with an entirely
different message, entirely different theology- as bad as Chritiandom
was at it's worst, it was not done by their messiah- it was done by
people who's transformation into those that created the Constitutional
democracy is a testament to the better intentions of that faith and
that history. Nothing like this ever occured in Islam.

You're projecting the present into the past and picking out the worst of
the Islamic world. As you should know, some of the most advanced
civilizations in the history of man were Islamic as well as relatively
very tolerant towards the other two bible based religions.

Truth be told, all three religions are inherently intolerant and
arrogant.

No... Marxism killed 125 million, and slaughtered more in a fashion
more hideous and arrogant than anything except Islam. That's why
you're a marxist, a liar, and a fraud.

Why do you keep bringing up Marxism?

They all have a tendency to think they're the best, God's favorite
and the smartest. Thus why they squabble constantly.

That's why you can lie, and not feel anything.
Marx said the same thing that Mohammed said- 'Peace in socialism is
the absence of any competing economic and or philosophic systems'

Hmmm...

Lame.

Yes marxism is, yes you are....

You are obviously preoccupied with Marxism.

Boy... I was a leftist educated college boy. I went thru torment to
learn the real history and it took two decades to overcome the lies.
You are a coward- a yada yada coward.

I see. Little wonder why you feel so much resentment towards Marxism.

You're pretty silly.

I'm am a serious man, and just a man. Of honor. I've researched
personally, been to the middleast, spoken with witnesses, arab,
muslim, Jewish, coptic, zoroastrian, buddhist, hindu- I've read and
studied and read and learned.

You seem very angry and close-minded. Maybe you're filtering everything
in the world through your hatred and resentment of Marxism? You should
let go of that.

You are a phony- a liar and there is nothing of honesty, nothing of
peace, nothing of integrity in you.

A fair and open-minded person would not jump to such a hasty conclusion.
After all, you don't even really know me...

--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: Sky and Tels anti-bible editorial
    ... >>Humanism as well as Marxism are religions of the Left. ... Fit the ... Marxism is not a religion. ...
    (sci.astro.amateur)
  • Re: was I stupid?
    ... "secular principles amount to a religion" but that THERE ARE SECULAR ... longer--of COURSE there are secular religions. ... The most widespread one in the modern world is assuredly Marxism ...
    (rec.arts.mystery)
  • Re: Portraying a Taoist Religious Conversion
    ... others in the Abrahamic tradition -- Islam, Baha'i, Unitarianism; ... several versions of Marxism; 4) various kinds of neo-paganism; 5) ... religions, walk like religions, quack like religions.... ... consider obnoxious 'evangelical' atheism, for instance, can ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)
  • Re: Portraying a Taoist Religious Conversion
    ... several versions of Marxism; 4) various kinds of neo-paganism; 5) ... Atheism per se is not a religion. ... religions, walk like religions, quack like religions.... ...
    (rec.arts.sf.composition)