Re: Kung Fu masters going at it in 1953
- From: "Greendistantstar" <pde63539Oremovethis@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 01:47:36 GMT
"Chas" <chasclements@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:afCdnTKlhZDpn8LbnZ2dnUVZ_oernZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
"YumYumPandaburger" <theoriginaldimi@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
Actually, they're throwing punches just like what the mma stuff is morphingWTF?
into; long, looping overhands, semi-Superman punches- little patty-cake
jabs.....
Yeah; sorry to confuse you.
It's a matter of trying to throw punches at a distance wherein one can beNo. In MMA it is a matter of trying to throw punches outside of the
caught by a kick.
distance wherein one can be caught in the clinch or by a takedown.
No- that's the reason that traditional boxing punches don't work.
It's first defined by kicking range, through punching range, and then into
clinch/takedown range.
......In
the case of the kung fu 'masters' it seems to be a matter of staying
outside of the range where one can be engaged in battle period.
Yeah; we can trust your good eyenot.
--
Chas
Chas.....really...you're defending the indefensible. On any level, by any
measure, what is shown on this clip is laughable.
I don't disagree with you re ranges, but within the context of punching range,
boxing is far and away the art that teaches the most effective techniques.
There is not a single straight punch thrown in this debacle, and I stand by my
comment that any halfway decent boxer would have KO'd either of these guys very
quickly.
As there were no kicks attempted, we have nothing to say regarding their kicking
skills, and invoking that as some sort of mitigating factor doesn't add up.
--
GDS
"Let's roll!"
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Kung Fu masters going at it in 1953
- From: Chas
- Re: Kung Fu masters going at it in 1953
- Prev by Date: Re: Hello.
- Next by Date: Re: Chavez == Dictator
- Previous by thread: Re: Kung Fu masters going at it in 1953
- Next by thread: Re: Kung Fu masters going at it in 1953
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
