Re: China's Aircraft Carrier potential draws nearer with every step.

On May 2, 12:36 am, "travis...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx" <travis...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:

You don't get it, fucker. I do not NEED ANY SUPPORT for my position

There is nobody, even my greatest detractors, who believes that I do
not know what I am talking about on this subject.

Well sure, if you are allowed to write blank cheques for whatever "the
subject" is. When you call into question exactly what the *** you are
talking about, everything goes to ***, don't it?

I am hoping that YOU will acknowledge lack of support as probative of your
idiocy.

I have support, however.

Let's assume you are correct. The set of all subjects which are not
Chinese aircraft or the Chinese Navy contains an infinite number of
subjects. Which subject in particular would you like to compare
knowledge on?

ANY. You're a chump, universally. I do not doubt that you bull***
about EVERYthing.

Care to make it interesting? How much money do you want to bet I can
come up with a topic I know far more about than you ever will?

If you let me pick, I would target specific forms of knowledge which I
am likely to possess that you are not; such as number of chinese
characters, playing go, or tai chi. While you may minimize these as
acceptable fields of comparison, that just speaks to your impotence in
those areas. I could just as easily minimize anything you've studied.

No you could not. You could try,

as you have so nobly tried

but you would fail as miserably as
you've done here. We could discuss the number of hairs on your ASS,
Olliiver, and you'll STILL look just as stupid, pathetic, and ignorant
as you do right now talking about impending "potential" within,
perhaps, our "lifetimes" of China's deciding to think about
contemplating building a fucking aircraft carrier!

Or maybe we could make it interesting and put a number down. Do you
got the balls to pay me if you lose?

-

.

Loading