Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: Mike <mkorneck@xxxxxx>
- Date: 20 Apr 2007 11:12:00 -0700
You seriously need to read slower. It is my admission that I am
putting a caveat on.
I am not back pedalling. I have tipped my hat to you for your creation
of your strawman.
-----Perhaps you need to re-read the definition of "strawman".
Nah, the current one will do just fine.
You are now admiting that you are bringing up stuff that is not even
in the top 10 list of relevancy. Carry on.
----I'd put it in the top five, like that notorious liberal, General
Odom.
http://www.foreignpolicy.com/story/cms.php?story_id=3430
Excuse me? Are you really that dense? The fact that Odom created the
strawman himself, and put it at number 5 doesn't make it any less of a
strawman when YOU use it!
---You still lose when you resort to childish vulgarities.
Oh right ... I forgot what newsgroup we were on. When was that rule
established?
---Ok, I win an arguement when I say "*** You?"
I never said that.
Well, *** you, then.
Damn, that's easy.
However, by your definition, you just lost.
And when you use mispelling of peoples names on purpose?
----Where did I do this?
Are you syaing you never ever have mispelled O'reilley's or anothers
name. Ok suds mcdufus! (that was an example for illustration purposes.
see if you can figure it out.)
----Probably mirroring my antagonist, if it happened at all.....
Oh, I see. Now you resort to claiming you were playing 'copycat'.
Another grown up game, I suppose?
To answer your question ... Nope, I'm up for it. Bring em here.
----You're the one in search of a challenging arguement, claiming mine
inadequete. They won't come to you, you've got to go there.
Obviously, they are mightily afeared!
I've simply pointed you in the direction you asked for.
I didn't ask for directions...
Go get em, tiger. BWHAHAHA!
It's amazing how you, dobbie, wannabee and other trolls regard it as
some sort of vindication when you laugh at your own jokes.
----I've served my hitch, Sparky. And you?
What does that have to do with your insincere comments about my care
package,
-----Oh, no, I was sincere about sending a package, until I found out
you were a civilian. No stogies and porn for you....
Ahh, my apologies then. It's hard to read your level of sincerity,
when you continuously use duplicitous tactics.
and glib comments about me going to Iraq?
-----Why won't you support your president and his party's policies
with your military service?
You don't think it is enough that I changed career paths? You think
that civilians that put their life on the line in theatre are
cowardly?
Are you fit enough?
I think so. Age limitations now.
Too good to be a common soldier? What?
That's a good question. What does the military normally due with PhD
level scientists that enlist? I do not know.
You should know full well that I am not enrolled in the military.
----And how would I know that, Sparky?
I might expect you to have a memory.
Let me give you a short primer...
----Yawn. Must you?
Oh, I insist!
I'm the PhD physicist who now works for the ARL,
----What is the ARL?
Army Research Lab.
----Seems to me you have all the time in the world to troll RMA. Hows
that monitor tan?
Nah, it isn't that hard to remember names when you have above average
IQ...
You, suds mcduff, are the guy who wants everyone to go argue with
someone else.
------Yawn. *You* asked for somewhere else to troll, remember?
Poor memory again ... You've done this in the past ...try to
remember... think hard ... warm up those ganglia...
Who spends his time reading what bloggers and crap say
about subjects, but never invstigates on his own, even if he has the
ability.
----Ah. General Odom's just a blogger with no credentials. Right. PhD,
huh?
Um ... I wasn't questioning that authority of the bloggers. reread
please.
Sure thing. I'll continue to support the military regardless of who
the president is, I hear it changes every 4-8 years.
"Support, but never serve." Great motto ya got there, doc.
Your support consists of pointing to Iraq and saying, "Get em guys!"
doesn't it?
*** you, you self righteous pice of crap. I eat with, get caught in
traffic with and work out with soldiers on a daily basis. My work will
save more soldiers lives than your efforts did.
----I'm not talkin about collecting a six figure salary whilestaying
in a hotel in the green zone. Why not the Guard or Reserve? Too good?
4F?
It's amazing how you ask the same question over and over again in the
same post, even before I've had a chance to answer. Is that some
attempt to create an illusion of substance?
You really could do with a course or two on debate.
But hey, thanks again for your sincerity...
----Bye. It's been real, it's been fun, but it ain't been real fun.
So clever.
Maybe you'll be able to troll us from Iraq.
Let's get this straight here and now. I do not have any set date lined
up. The possibility exists, but is dependant on many factors.
-Mike K.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- References:
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: Mike
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: Mike
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: Mike
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: Mike
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: Mike
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: Mike
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- Prev by Date: Re: For Trav: World War 3: China vs. USA over Iran
- Next by Date: Re: For Trav: World War 3: China vs. USA over Iran
- Previous by thread: Re: ot-letter from a marine
- Next by thread: Re: ot-letter from a marine
- Index(es):