Re: ot-letter from a marine

On Apr 18, 4:01 pm, Mike <mkorn...@xxxxxx> wrote:
-------I never claimed it was given as *the* primary factor. Just a
false factor.

So far, we have your word, and the word of your biased cite, that
damage to troop morale is being touted as a reason to not withdraw.

-----So, you've never heard or read that an early withdrawl will hurt
troop morale, now?
You admitted as much a couple posts previously.

Here it is:
Me: You're saying that the war party *hasn't* stated that an early
withdrawl would hurt troop morale?

You: I'm saying that it was never given as the primary factor.

You're either dishonest or dense.

Either that or I got suckered in by your straw man. Good thing I
sobered up.

----I'm voting dense......


----A rightard that can't remember his statements in the thread. What
else is new?

Hey puppy, got someone else on some other newsgroup you want me to
argue with?

----I know, it sucks when a progressive runs rings around ya , eh?


Cause you sure ain't cutting it.

----Check and mate. Try alt.politics.liberalism, they don't mind
argueing with trolls over there.
BTW, if going to Iraq was't troll BS, let us know when you deploy, we
might send you a care package......

.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ot-letter from a marine
    ... damage to troop morale is being touted as a reason to not withdraw. ... You admitted as much a couple posts previously. ... I'm saying that it was never given as the primary factor. ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: ot-letter from a marine
    ... damage to troop morale is being touted as a reason to not withdraw. ... I'm saying that it was never given as the primary factor. ...
    (rec.martial-arts)