Re: ot-letter from a marine

On Apr 18, 3:07 pm, Mike <mkorn...@xxxxxx> wrote:
-Mike K.

-------I never claimed it was given as *the* primary factor. Just a
false factor.

So far, we have your word, and the word of your biased cite, that
damage to troop morale is being touted as a reason to not withdraw.

-----So, you've never heard or read that an early withdrawl will hurt
troop morale, now?
You admitted as much a couple posts previously.

Here it is:
Me: You're saying that the war party *hasn't* stated that an early
withdrawl would hurt troop morale?

You: I'm saying that it was never given as the primary factor.

You're either dishonest or dense.


So, you basically started this thread to prop up and then tear down a
straw man? Nice... what else is new?

----A rightard that can't remember his statements in the thread. What
else is new?




.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: ot-letter from a marine
    ... damage to troop morale is being touted as a reason to not withdraw. ... You admitted as much a couple posts previously. ... I'm saying that it was never given as the primary factor. ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: ot-letter from a marine
    ... damage to troop morale is being touted as a reason to not withdraw. ... You admitted as much a couple posts previously. ... argueing with trolls over there. ...
    (rec.martial-arts)
  • Re: ot-letter from a marine
    ... So far, we have your word, and the word of your biased cite, that ... damage to troop morale is being touted as a reason to not withdraw. ...
    (rec.martial-arts)