Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: Mike <mkorneck@xxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Apr 2007 13:01:34 -0700
-------I never claimed it was given as *the* primary factor. Just a
false factor.
So far, we have your word, and the word of your biased cite, that
damage to troop morale is being touted as a reason to not withdraw.
-----So, you've never heard or read that an early withdrawl will hurt
troop morale, now?
You admitted as much a couple posts previously.
Here it is:
Me: You're saying that the war party *hasn't* stated that an early
withdrawl would hurt troop morale?
You: I'm saying that it was never given as the primary factor.
You're either dishonest or dense.
Either that or I got suckered in by your straw man. Good thing I
sobered up.
----A rightard that can't remember his statements in the thread. What
else is new?
Hey puppy, got someone else on some other newsgroup you want me to
argue with? Cause you sure ain't cutting it.
-Mike K.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- References:
- ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: Herbert Cannon
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: Herbert Cannon
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: Mike
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: Mike
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: Mike
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: Mike
- Re: ot-letter from a marine
- From: suds mcduff
- ot-letter from a marine
- Prev by Date: Re: ot-letter from a marine
- Next by Date: Re: For Trav: World War 3: China vs. USA over Iran
- Previous by thread: Re: ot-letter from a marine
- Next by thread: Re: ot-letter from a marine
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|