Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: "Renli" <usagi.meijin@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 10 Apr 2007 19:47:35 -0700
On Apr 11, 8:45 am, "Rich" <rlancash...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10 apr, 18:49, "Renli" <usagi.mei...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Apr 10, 3:43 pm, "Rich" <rlancash...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 9 apr, 13:44, "Renli" <usagi.mei...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Well, that's a conflict of interests. Would you ask a scientist
employed by a tobacco company to contribute the science to a Smoking
FAQ? :P
pure opinuendo.
No, a direct parallel.
Actually it's opinuendo - because I have (to use your analogy) asked a
scientist who was *not* employed by a tobacco company to contribute
the science to a smoking FAQ.
No you haven't.
Actually I have - not that you would know - which is why it's so
suprising you would make such a comment. I know quite a few physicists
and engineers from when I used to work for the university of (x) on
their nuclear reactor.
Anyways, I've certainly asked YOU and everyone here - so as I said -
opinuendo. Either there are "real scientists" here and your analogy
doesn't apply, or there are no real scientists here and you're not
qualified to make your analogy :)
I'm quite happy to give you pointers where to look for more
information about science. However, you just keep pointing at the FAQ
as if yours is the definitive truth and the information's already
there. I've read it, and I'm still no clearer on *exactly* what chi
is, or how to test for it.
If you disagree with the FAQ the onus is on you to make a submission.
If you don't, or don't agree, I could care less. Others will help and
your name won't go in. Whoop de doo for you. Right? right.
-
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Rich
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Mike
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- References:
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: godstar
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Shuurai
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Renli
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Shuurai
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Renli
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Rich
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Renli
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Rich
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Renli
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Rich
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Renli
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Rich
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Renli
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- From: Rich
- Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- Prev by Date: Re: The beginning of the end - Ju Renqing's new investment fund
- Next by Date: Re: Bye, bye Miss Amercian Pie
- Previous by thread: Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- Next by thread: Re: The Chi FAQ v1.1.7
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|