Re: Israel?


hal@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Fri, 30 Jun 2006 19:50:08 GMT, "David L. Burkhead"
<dburkhuad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


So just what do you have against Turner? He just too much of a
philanthropist for you?

http://www.tedturner.com/tedturner/philanthropies.asp

Irrelevant to his political persuasion.

Um, hardly. He is a liberal.


So you can remember events that happened almost 200 years before you
were born but you can't remember that a few hours ago David mentioned
Mr. Turner *because* the man is a liberal? Turner is the counter
example to your implication that the media isn't liberal.


And an active philanthropist. Very
typical for the liberal.

You have a problem with that?


No you just need to learn to read.


I know you would so much rather that the rich *** on the poor.

Straw man. Just because I disagree with you about what actually would
benefit the people in this country (all the people, not just the class you
want to grant special privileges) does not mean what you want to assume it
means.

so just what does helping the poor mean to you? How would you help
the poor if you could? If people of means do not help the poor, and
the government does not help the poor, what does that mean to society
in the long run?


People of means do help the poor and that isn't going to change.


What would Jesus do?


Why he would follow your every post and tell everyone that you are
right about everything even though you can't prove anything. That is
what every historical figure would do - or at least what you would have
us believe.

-Eric

.

Quantcast