Re: First Haditha and now Ishaqi

But, since you couldn't find your ass with both hands, here's the report
of the 9/11 commission. Read it and satisfy yourself that the Washington
Post wasn't lying.

http://www.9-11commission.gov/report/index.htm

Where's the page and paragraph number? You're the one making the claim.


David Kay certainly believes that Iraq had ties with terrorism.

You mean the same David Kay who was absolutely sure there were WMD in
Iraq

Please provide a reference for this speculation.

but then after searching in vain for eight months had to admit there
weren't any?

So, you are saying he is honest about his findings. You *DO* accept his
findings, don't you?

That David Kay?

Yes, that one. The guy who's findings you accept as being factual.

The David Kay who resigned in ignominy
even before the final report documenting his failure was submitted?

He resigned when his job was done. His jos was to provide a report. Not
a *specific* report with a *specific* conclusion.

That
David Kay?

Yes, that David Kay. The one who gave an unbiased report on his
findings..

Why the *** would I care about the *other* *** opinions
of another gullible moron like you?

Gullible? You seem ready to believe all the facts in his report, but
call him gullible?

Yeagh, THAT David Kay. The same guy that you are admitting had the
honesty to

Listen, moron, the 9/11 commission said Iraq had no links to al Qaeda,
had nothing to do with 9/11. Only morons like you still keep the faith.


PS You see, moron, attacking a country, Iraq, that had absoutely
nothing to do with 9/11 is a criminal act!

Absolutely nothing ehh?

Go reread (read the *whole* thing for the first time?) your posted
article. It talks about and discusses numerous links. It discredits
some, but not all of them.


What, you fucking moron, do you think supports *any* link between Iraq
and 9/11? The fucking CIA has had more and more recent dealings with al
Qaeda than Iraq ever did. Should the US bomb CIA headquarters in
Virginia?

The links that the article you posted refered to. Go read it. You *do*
read the articles you post, don't you? Oh, that's right, I alread
proved that you do *not*.

It's a done deal, moron. Even the goddamned 9/11 commission says there
wasn't any collaboration. NONE! Get it? NONE as in NONE! Sinking in
yet? NONE!

Unfortunately for you, people are capable of reading and can easily
verify the fact that we have been discussing ties with terrorism in
general, not just al quaeda specifically.

Your continual blindness to the words that others use is laughable. Why
don't you just write down your misinterpretions of what other people
have said and respond to that? Oh, you already do ...

-Mike K.

.