Re: WOTT: Is Pacifism *really* incompatible with martial arts?

On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 14:39:21 GMT, Rabid Weasel
<lawson@NO12915SPAM+dayton.net> wrote:

On Wed, 07 Jun 2006 01:11:21 -0700, hughwoodintedslaman wrote:

Your repeated bitter personal attacks on Hal do nothing to advance the
discussion on this group either.

Especially as you launch into them in every single thread.

OK, now I know you're trolling. I wish you'd have made it clear earlier
so that I could just ignore you.


It's true Kirk. You do. As is David now. Goldberg. And others.
Face it. You conservatives are circling the wagons because you are
about ready to get your asses kicked again by The People because you
are fucking things up so horribly _again_. All your self righteous
hypocracy is being exposed for what it is and you are attacking back.
Can't blame you at all. Throughout history the conservatives have
been fucking things up for The People and have attacked the
progressives trying to make changes. We've danced this dance before,
but since your kind apparently hasn't learned one goddamned thing
throughout history, I guess we are just going to have to kick your
stupid asses again.

I'm up for it. Viva La Revolution.

Need any more lessons in conditional pacifism? Take a look at the US
Constitution, and you will see the greatest ever set of really pissed
off liberals who had to kick some stupid conservative's asses. We won
then and we will win again.

Now I bet we are going to get a lesson in how badly Konservative Kirk
et al can distort the history of the United States and political
science.

Oh, the logical fallacies...... let me count the ways......

here we go... a one, and a two, and a.......

Hal
.