Re: Many vs Few techs. An interesting p.o.v

On 22 Mar 2006 07:04:13 -0800, "Matthew Freedman"
<matthewfreedman@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:


antipodean.lower.mammal@xxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:

<snip>

Given that Stage 2 uses progressive resistance (30-100%) and Stage 3
uses progressive resistance + subs and position change - AND - given
that Stage 3 seems to be the bulk of the practice (correct? Or not?),
do you feel the 3-I gives you enough time to learn the escape before
having to do it 'for real'?

aha, here's the miscommunication.

stage 2 is, by far, the bulk of the practice. and the progressive
resistance is what gives you time to learn the technique before having
to do it for real.

Mea Culpa. I misunderstood

That makes much more sense to me


I guess what I'm asking is - if you kept everything about your
practice the same EXCEPT you spent 2 or 3 months addressing one
particular topic (I dunno, say triangle from guard) - do you feel that
would serve you better or worse that what is currently practiced?


that's an interesting question and i honestly do not know what the
answer is.

What's the official 'party line' on why things are done the way the
are in your club?

one thing is that, in my gym at least, we do no-gi grappling
exclusively, which limits the number of techniques that are available.
i believe that this is unique among SBG gyms, btw.

I like that abt no gi. It reduces 'moves' but increases 'movement'.

Thanks for the clarification, Matthew






- If it flies, floats or fucks, you are better off
renting it.

************************************************************
Remove FAKE to email me
*************************************************************
.

Loading