Re: Question about the WOTTs
- From: hal@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 12:57:10 -0700
On 2 Mar 2006 11:34:19 -0800, "Evil Shaman" <parker7273@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
hal@xxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:20:24 -0700, "Chas" <chasclements@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Give them a choice between socialism and a free market and see what they
choose.
The two are most certainl NOT mutually exclusive. You can have free
markets and still feed your poor.
Sure you can, but that isn't socialism. Socialism implies government
control over the economy. It is the opposite of free markets.
No, socialism does not imply _total_ state control of the economy.
That's communism. Socialism is providing government management of
social systems for the benefit of the poor and society as a whole.
Having social welfare systems does not mean can't have free markets.
Hal
Bryce
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Question about the WOTTs
- From: Evil Shaman
- Re: Question about the WOTTs
- References:
- Re: Question about the WOTTs
- From: hal
- Re: Question about the WOTTs
- From: Fraser Johnston
- Re: Question about the WOTTs
- From: hal
- Re: Question about the WOTTs
- From: Rabid Weasel
- Re: Question about the WOTTs
- From: hal
- Re: Question about the WOTTs
- From: Chas
- Re: Question about the WOTTs
- From: hal
- Re: Question about the WOTTs
- From: Chas
- Re: Question about the WOTTs
- From: hal
- Re: Question about the WOTTs
- From: Evil Shaman
- Re: Question about the WOTTs
- Prev by Date: Re: Question about the WOTTs
- Next by Date: Re: Question about the WOTTs
- Previous by thread: Re: Question about the WOTTs
- Next by thread: Re: Question about the WOTTs
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|