Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: Mark Goldberg <msgoldberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:53:51 -0500
Steve Perry wrote:
In article <1140293942.152695.319200@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>, Sam
the Bam <samthebam1@xxxxxxxxx> wrote
PS VIP, hunting accidents, Armageddon... isn't there
some plot material here?
You know, I'd be perfectly happy to have a few qualified shrinks read
my posts here and compare them to Herr Doktor Goldberg's and say who
they think is frothing at the mouth. To be fair, one democrat, one
republican, and one independent; a Freudian, Jungian, and maybe a
Primal Screamer, and best two out of three.
Put your money on Goldberg to out-gibber me by three lengths ...
Fiction is tricky. You have to make it sound real.
Gosh... you're ginned up story of Cheney is dead in the water 48 hours later. And since then.... what do the wire services report.
Go thru the list of stories Mr Silat. Go ahead.
!5 dead in Nigeria, 12 dead in Libya. Marches in Pakistan, with signs saying God bless Hitler. Across the idiot's path that is Islam is destructiveness, hate, bigotry, and today, as I look at the news.
A poll in Britain says "40% of british muslims want sharia law, 20% believe their have sympathy with the "feelings and motives" of the suicide bombers who attacked London last July 7.
Can you imagine that. They live off a democracy. One in five sides with homicide killers who blow up women and kids and innocents, and more than 40% want law that is bigoted, hateful, and submits all to the tyranny of ..... Islam. Gosh.
Oh, that was just 10% of the daily news about the threatened 'armageddon' by Islam adherents- their words- not mine.
That was in the news this week.
Oh course, you'd love to dissimmulate about the relative values of the stories, and smear others personally.
That's because you're such a stand up fellow.
Actually, before every major conflict there are those like yourself, who smugly question the sanity, the ravings, of those who point out the obvious. And of course, it's so much easier than actually reading all the relevant stories and printing what they actually say, and compare them to the stories of the current time, and see, what's what.
But you just go on and be that stand up guy, Perry, you just call me Herr Doktor, and besmirch with your're standup character.... the stories are what they are.
And yours, is a dead one. Which is what is bringing out that charming character defect in you just at the moment.
Yes... defect, flaw.
I wouldn't stoop to call you a frothing anything.
Just a bit flawed. More than a bit out of sorts.
Over what.... you're dead story.
Nobody would believe it if I came up with a character like Goldberg.
Go see a psychiatrist. Bring him the posts, then you're bull*** lying screenwriters smear here.
Go.... it's a faggity thing to do. You'd like to act out your vulgarity.
Too far-fetched. Scratch ten people on the street who know what a
shotgun is and ask them if the word "shotgun" and "blast" have any
relationship, and unless they are finalists on Jay Leno's walkaout, I'm
guessing some of them might indeed think those two words could now and
again be in the same sentence.
That's it, act with ambience, and pretend you're not just some ordinary putz who got a dead duck of a story in his back pocket.
It's rotting Steven. It smells.
But do try to put some stink upon others. It's so manly and noble of you.
"Excuse me, sir, but if I said, one hunter blasted another with his
shotgun." what do you think that means? Uh huh. Oh. That he shot him?
You sure about that? Thank you, sir."
Accident.... but you're obsession isn't an accident.
It's learned.
The Veep shot a guy. Not in question. The term "blasted" is perfect
valid. Shotguns go "boom" when they fire.
And dead stories dont' just die.... they take along the purveryors with them.
Or "bang."
As in your whimpering?
Look! A quail! Boom! Got the big orange one -- oops ...
Well, we can't all be such perfect creatures as you Steven. You, and the
others who looked for evil intent, got you're own right between you're wittle eyes. Bullseye.
If it had been Al Gore who shot somebody when he was on the job, I'd
have had the same questions.
If it was the same event... I wouldn't. What does an accident have to do with machinations except as projection.
What Gore did this week was an outrage. Truly. It was a sign of a kind of imbalance not only of thought, but of character. And if you're lazy, I can point you to commentators not of the right, who said just that.
This doesn't happen every day, now does
it? How many sitting vice-presidents have we had who shot somebody?
Aaron Burr's story didn't get talked about for four days, if I remember my history. And that involved a death.
Two. But the first one was before my time, it was a duel where the
other guy got to shoot back, and when the law came to collect him
because it was illegal -- Hamilton died in New York, not New Jersey --
Burr had already boogied. No FBI back then for interstate flight ...
That Goldberg wants to hare off on some tangental spew about Arabs and
cartoons and the Sudan has absolute nothing to do with wanting to know
how the current VPOTUS came to pot a hunting companion.
No.... what's happened is you've blithely besmirched me with your two bit anger because you got caught obsessing about a nickel story that is dead, gone and without substance, and can't face it.
You can't besmirch the vice pres, and the average joe who pointed out the 1000 times more meaningful plethora of worldwide stories, vastly more meaningful to the history of the times, and the events of the day,
who merely stated you were being fatuous, was too much for you to take.
Now you have to bury the guy who mentioned your 'fatuous' explanation and rage about his sanity. You're full of *** Perry.
You and your character assassination bit. Grow up. Take your posts and go to the shrink and I'll bet you he asks you this..." Why are you bothering that guy?
"What's going on in your life that you act out over this?
Go ahead big mouth. Go show him what a large man you are, with your nickel accusations.
The "official"
story seems, oh, I dunno, as fishy as Ted Kennedy driving into the
drink and drowning his passenger. I never liked that fantasy story,
either.
But it's not relevant. This week, there was a plethora of stories, that need to be engaged by many many nations, and effect world events and thinking. This is clear. You just don't like that you followed a dead story, and you get nasty and vicious over.... nothing at all.
Speaking of fatuous.
I'm an equal opportunity eyebrow-raiser. I register Independent. I
think the D's have as many lying and arrogant politicians as the R's.
I voted for Clinton twice. I voted for Reagan twice.
Goldberg seems to think that the role of a patriot is to react
reflexively to anything the elected government says as if it was from
God's lips to their ears, and what they do and why is none of our
business. No. You can love America without loving whichever Prez is
running things from the White House.
Now you're dissimulating, but at least not calling my sanity into question. An improvement. I didn't say you were a nut, or a traitor, did I?
I thought you're obsession with the story was fatuous, oddly obsessed, in a week of enormous amounts of stories, clearly definging and defyin certain conventional wisdoms about the Religion of Peaces, and all that it touches. This is clear, this is obvious. I didn't rage on about it, except to note it, and ask why we have to look at a non story when there's clearly an important one in front of us?
But you just accused me of seeing muslims under my bed, then being a headcase, calling me herr doktor, etc etc.
This is you're idea of being a standup guy, Steve. I question your integrity over something like this.
If I used license, at least that's better that what Cheney
did -- no stamp ...
Get over yourself. You're gonna blow an artery with this Type-A
knee-jerk rage. Chill out.
Actually Steve, go ahead, show this to some guys who work in the field.
I think they will ask you questions about your character, about your obsessing, not mine.
There's an envy, an ugliness, a childishness that seems to be haunting you. The stories I pointed out, are growing- your's is a dead toot.
Mark
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: hal
- Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: Steve Perry
- Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: Mike Sigman
- Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: Steve Perry
- Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: Mike Sigman
- Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: Steve Perry
- Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: Richard Ward
- Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: David L. Burkhead
- Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: Richard Ward
- Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: Steve Perry
- Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: Mark Goldberg
- Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: Steve Perry
- Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: Sam the Bam
- Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- From: Steve Perry
- Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- Prev by Date: Re: Muay Thai
- Next by Date: Re: Butterfly knives
- Previous by thread: Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- Next by thread: Re: Don't bag a Republican; they're too hard to clean
- Index(es):
Loading