Re: Trolling now a federal crime. What First Amendment?

On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:53:50 -0600, Herbert Cannon wrote:

>
> "Rabid Weasel" <lawson@NO17956SPAM+dayton.net> wrote in message
> pan.2006.01.10.14.52.12.436099@NO17956SPAM+dayton.net">news:pan.2006.01.10.14.52.12.436099@NO17956SPAM+dayton.net...
>> On Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:45:00 -0600, Herbert Cannon wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>> I just know Herb is somehow going to try and defend this. This is gonna
>>>> be awesome. I am giddy with anticipation.
>>>
>>> Must have been pushed by NOW or one of those liberal women's groups.
>>
>> Most likely of all is that it was simply intended to be a broad measure to
>> give "protection" to women and it's over-reaching consequences not fully
>> considered. Kinda like Rico.
>>
> What is wrong with RICCO?

It can be applied to vastly more situations than what was originally
intended in the "conspiracy" pitch.

Whether or not that's "wrong" can be debated. But it "is" nonetheless.

Peace favor your sword (IH),
Kirk

.

Relevant Pages