Re: Being called ugly by a frog.

On Fri, 30 Sep 2005 11:34:39 -0600, "Chas" <chasclements@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

>"David L. Burkhead" <dburkhuad@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote
>> It's perjury and it's a felony.
>
>He didn't 'perjure' himself. The acts he participated in didn't meet the
>definition of 'sex' that was set by the prosecution. They met for about
>three days to decide what acts constituted 'sex with that woman', and their
>acts didn't meet the criteria.
>Same with the definition of 'is'- hell yes there's a contextual meaning, and
>ignoring that in order to claim some incidence of 'perjury' is utterly
>politically motivated.
>Clinton was/is an ***- but come at him for what he actually did instead
>of some manufactured infraction that is simply embarrassing rather than an
>act against the Republic or the Office of the President.
>Geez; who'd want to be President if it didn't come with a little hummer
>every once in a while?

Hell, who'ld want to be anything at all if it didn't come with a
little hummer every once in a while?

Welcome back BTW.

Hal

>
>Chas
>

.

Quantcast