Re: At what point does hand-to-hand combat become a martial art?
- From: T <T@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 11 Aug 2005 18:09:09 GMT
The way I understand art is the opposite of science. In science every thing must be exact. Math is a science 2+2=4, no if and or buts. Art is free form, no exact way. One can teach a kick by science but everyone will do it slightly differently but still get results. Pure art like music or painting is totally up to the artiest.
Au contraire, science is messy and wrong, whereas math is beautiful and perfect. Best you can do in science is hypothesis and evidence; in math we have proof.
.
- References:
- At what point does hand-to-hand combat become a martial art?
- From: Rip Rock
- Re: At what point does hand-to-hand combat become a martial art?
- From: kirks_bitch
- Re: At what point does hand-to-hand combat become a martial art?
- From: Topo Gigio
- At what point does hand-to-hand combat become a martial art?
- Prev by Date: Re: At what point does hand-to-hand combat become a martial art?
- Next by Date: Re: Hackenschmidt's 1909 catch-as-catch-can wrestling
- Previous by thread: Re: At what point does hand-to-hand combat become a martial art?
- Next by thread: Re: At what point does hand-to-hand combat become a martial art?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading
