Re: Ninja-stuff

Douglas Eagleson wrote:
> The last posting degenerated into
> USENET trollwork.

The last posting *started* with usenet trollwork. You
can't polish a turd, Beavis.

> This time my comments are for
> the readers who do not have to
> question the rather debated
> topic of internal martial arts.

If they don't have to question it, why do you have to
tell them?

> A guy was recently awarded
> a prize for fighting a bear.

I would expect a prize for defeating a bear... anyone
can fight a bear.

> And there are two ways to fight one.

Does each way warrant a prize?

> One way is to have the bear attack
> to kill you.
>
> The other way is to fight the bear who
> simply wants to get away.
>
> The distinction in animal behavior
> is tremendous.

Unless the bear decides to kill you to facilitate
getting away... in whach case there is no distinction.

> A little snake is remembered as
> ferocious when it attacks to kill.

Not really, no. Snakes are rarely 'ferocious' animals.
They avoid conflict. If they need to strike they do so
quickly and then move away at the first opportunity.

> And when the little snake points
> its head at the human it always
> scares the human.

Some humans.

> Aand so the fine art of bear fighting
> is actually a race to kill the bear
> trying to escape.

What is so "fine" about the art of killing an innocent
animal just to win a prize?

> Making the old dog and bear fights
> more indicative of the match between
> a large bear and the human.

Not really the same thing at all.

> A reader should notice my rather
> odd writing style right now.
> It is intentional to set the context.

It's not really that odd. I find that most wanna-be
pseudo-zen bullshitters write like you are writing.

> Humans are not animals.

Yes, we are actually.

> And so the question arises.
> Why.

No, it doesn't - see above.

> Why does the bare soul have to exist
> in the hypnotic trance to make the
> human an animal?

The human is already an animal.

> Some say the animal has no little mind
> of the intelligent human kind.

Some would say the same about certain humans...

> Maybe the animal only walks alone
> with the subconcious mind acting.

Some animals - humans - have greater capacity for
conscious thought than others.

> I have my own opinion, but at least
> I openly consider the facts and try
> to communicate them.

What facts are you openly considering? You've managed
to say almost nothing in as many words as possbile.

> SO, the ninnja is not the question
> here. It is the reason for the
> animals superior fighting.

Simple. Bears are bigger, stronger, and have big claws.

> So USENET answer away.

Usenet has answered.

.

Quantcast