Re: Simple name for (6x,4)(4,2x)(4,6x)(2x,4)?
- From: marlonvalck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Marlon)
- Date: 25 Jan 2011 19:01:30 GMT
TonySteinbach wrote:
I want to do a tutorial for Juggling Central for (6x,4)(4,2x)(4,6x)(2x,4)
because it was pretty much THE reason I finally ended up getting (6x,4)*
down. However, I really don't want to say (6x,4)(4,2x)(4,6x)(2x,4) every
time I mention the trick. Does anyone have any suggestions for a simpler
name?
The one that comes to mind is a (6x,4)box. because thats pretty much
exactly what it looks like. I know thats not a precise description, but I
think it gets the job done. Thoughts?
refer to it as "The Trick" in the rest of the tutorial after the first
time.
although (6x,4)box is usuable you should mention it's just a name you give
it and not (yet) a 'official' name.
--
----== posted via www.jugglingdb.com ==----
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Simple name for (6x,4)(4,2x)(4,6x)(2x,4)?
- From: TonySteinbach
- Re: Simple name for (6x,4)(4,2x)(4,6x)(2x,4)?
- References:
- Simple name for (6x,4)(4,2x)(4,6x)(2x,4)?
- From: TonySteinbach
- Simple name for (6x,4)(4,2x)(4,6x)(2x,4)?
- Prev by Date: Re: [OT] Pointless Argument Internet Forum
- Next by Date: Re: Simple name for (6x,4)(4,2x)(4,6x)(2x,4)?
- Previous by thread: Simple name for (6x,4)(4,2x)(4,6x)(2x,4)?
- Next by thread: Re: Simple name for (6x,4)(4,2x)(4,6x)(2x,4)?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|