Re: ANOTHER sport vs art thread
- From: sondre_goes_pro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Øverby, Sondre)
- Date: 07 Dec 2007 21:59:56 GMT
Mark Nicoll wrote:
Øverby, Sondre wrote:
case, since I was not selling anything, it was not spamming nor
trolling. And you cannot say anything whatsoever against that, because you
don't know my purposes of posting it.
I'm a little confused here - what on earth is the point in posting a
thread without letting anyone know it's purpose? You've been posting so
much around here recently, I refuse to believe you're unaware of how most
people in these parts have come to feel about the subject. Surely you'd
have received far more helpful responses if you'd given them the
impression that there was some kind of useful method to your madness. Now
they're just debating whether you're spamming or trolling... predictable,
no?
So what's the real reason you're asking that question?
I was referring to that LP didn't seem to understand the purpose; I dunno
about you other people. The point was to bring up that we do in fact have
an art that is a sport, believe it or not. I wasn't waiting for such a
huge thread to grow from it, even though you might say I should have
expected it.
--
----== posted via www.jugglingdb.com ==----
.
- References:
- ANOTHER sport vs art thread
- From: Øverby, Sondre
- Re: ANOTHER sport vs art thread
- From: donaldmarshall
- Re: ANOTHER sport vs art thread
- From: Little Paul
- Re: ANOTHER sport vs art thread
- From: Øverby, Sondre
- Re: ANOTHER sport vs art thread
- From: Mark Nicoll
- ANOTHER sport vs art thread
- Prev by Date: Re: ANOTHER sport vs art thread
- Next by Date: Re: ANOTHER sport vs art thread
- Previous by thread: Re: ANOTHER sport vs art thread
- Next by thread: sport
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading