Re: Order of Precedence for Orders
- From: "George Lucki" <georgelucki@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 26 Jun 2006 06:00:04 GMT
"Marc Moisan" <quizball@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:JhIng.97376$S61.49533@xxxxxxxxxxx
"Andrew Chaplin" <ab.chaplin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:hdWdnUFtqtuO2wLZnZ2dnUVZ_sednZ2d@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
You get to choose the ones you want depicted, but you ought to go with
the custom for the jurisdiction in which you are displaying them.
BTW, no periods in postnominals for the CD. See para 10 of Annex A
(http://www.admfincs.forces.gc.ca/admfincs/subjects/cfao/018-09_e.asp)
.
--
Andrew Chaplin, CD and Bar, VD and Scar, CCM and Sprocket (handlebars,
no grip)
SIT MIHI GLADIUS SICUT SANCTO MARTINO
(If you're going to e-mail me, you'll have to get "yourfinger." out.)
I don't to contradict you, but wether or not to put period in
post-nominals is a personal choice. You can see just as many places where
you can see "CD" or "C.D."
Have a look at:
http://www.admfincs.forces.gc.ca/admfincs/subjects/cfao/018-12_e.asp
This order of precedence is out of date. See:
http://www.gg.ca/honours/op/index_e.asp for the current order.
This page uses C.D.
I've seen both used as well.
George Lucki
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Order of Precedence for Orders
- From: Andrew Chaplin
- Re: Order of Precedence for Orders
- References:
- Order of Precedence for Orders
- From: Marc Moisan
- Re: Order of Precedence for Orders
- From: George Lucki
- Re: Order of Precedence for Orders
- From: Marc Moisan
- Re: Order of Precedence for Orders
- From: Andrew Chaplin
- Re: Order of Precedence for Orders
- From: Marc Moisan
- Order of Precedence for Orders
- Prev by Date: Re: Order of Precedence for Orders
- Next by Date: Re: Order of Precedence for Orders
- Previous by thread: Re: Order of Precedence for Orders
- Next by thread: Re: Order of Precedence for Orders
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|