Re: S&W revolvers failing
- From: "Ken" <ktm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 1 Apr 2006 02:35:22 +0000 (UTC)
"R.M.R." <Para9mm@xxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:e0j71c$1ts$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
# In regards to the S&W saga.It's unfortunate today that the only
# awareness people know of the deal is through the internet.Due to the
# firearm magazines cowtowning to S&W products (NRA magazines included)
# not many newer gun owners know the true meaning when someone says S&W
# must die or mentions boycott.It's evident when several posts a month are
# in regards to those that bought or are considering buying a S&W.It's
# also evident that the flame has dwindled to a cinder from those that
# were up in arms when the story first broke.How easy we forget...
#
I just bought a S&W 642, I had completely forgotten @ the boycott.
If I'd seen this thread sooner, I'd have bought something else.
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
Learn about rec.guns at http://www.recguns.net
--------------------------------------------------------------------------
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: S&W revolvers failing
- From: Mike
- Re: S&W revolvers failing
- From: Doug Kanter
- Re: S&W revolvers failing
- From: R.M.R.
- Re: S&W revolvers failing
- Prev by Date: Re: What firearm for the appalachian trail? (long hike)
- Next by Date: Re: Nikon Scopes
- Previous by thread: Re: What firearm for the appalachian trail? (long hike)
- Next by thread: Re: S&W revolvers failing
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
