Re: Natural landscaping and home values
- From: Sheldon <PENMART01@xxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 27 Jul 2008 19:00:35 -0700 (PDT)
On Jul 27, 7:08�pm, Phisherman <no...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:53:51 -0700 (PDT), Sheldon <PENMAR...@xxxxxxx>
wrote:
(paghat) wrote:
We would like to live further in the country with more land.to at least move the rhody
collection and whatever ferns and perennials aren't easily replaced.
If you move to a *real* rural woodland setting you won't need to
landscape, you'll have the real deal... any parking out will look
absolutely fake. �And unless you first build a sturdy fenced area most
any plant you bring will be devoured by deer (and rabbits).
I live in the middle of the city and deer have destroyed over 50% of
what I planted. �The deer killed the neighbors fruit trees by peeling
off the bark. � I either use the electric fence or cover the plant
with chicken wire. �In my case it doesn't look like there is any
difference living in the city or country.
In which city do you live that there's a deer population. I doubt
there are deer in most populous cities (to survive deer need many
acres of forest and meadow to browse), sounds more like the outskirts
of a small rural town/village.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Natural landscaping and home values
- From: Phisherman
- Re: Natural landscaping and home values
- References:
- Natural landscaping and home values
- From: thomasb369@xxxxxxxxx
- Re: Natural landscaping and home values
- From: paghat
- Re: Natural landscaping and home values
- From: Sheldon
- Re: Natural landscaping and home values
- From: Phisherman
- Natural landscaping and home values
- Prev by Date: Re: Bean and Tomatoe question
- Next by Date: Re: spirea suckers
- Previous by thread: Re: Natural landscaping and home values
- Next by thread: Re: Natural landscaping and home values
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|