Re: Could someone test this please..?



Timothy wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:54:08 -0800, David Ross wrote:
>
> > Okay, I finally got around to viewing some of your Web pages. Generally,
> > they are okay; but I have a few criticisms.
> >
>
> O' I knew you would 80P ........
>
> > Your Contacts page might be better if you also included a postal address.
> >
>
> I really don't want my postal address out there in the wide internet like
> that. I get enough junk mail and really don't want anonymous net trolls to
> show up at my door. The resource pages are not to generate local customers
> for my business.
>
> > Your use of an orange background (#ff9933) with white in some of your
> > boxes means that people with visual handicaps might have trouble reading
> > the text. This affect not only those with some visual impairment but also
> > those with color blindness.
> >
> Of course you have to view it when I'm playing with colors. I went and got
> a web safe color wheel.... seems to make things worse for me. Way too many
> choices. I'm sure the colors will change 5 more time before the end of the
> night 80)
>
> > In general, your links do not change color when their pages are visited.
> > Many will find this annoying.
> >
> > Your home page now has 159 HTML 4.01 Strict errors versus 29 XHTML 1.0
> > Transitional errors previously. Your style-sheet now has 1 error versus
> > no errors previously.
>
> Whoa.....! How does the validator return that to you? When I check I get a
> green light? The css error is really a work around for an internet
> destroyer bug. Keeps the navigation tabs from jumping around in IE. Just
> for full disclousre, many of the pages do not validate due to google
> adsence's script code. They generate 4 errors and I'm not about to fix
> them. Adsence forbids it.

<http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.resources.ywgc.com>

But now there are only 9 HTML 4.01 Strict errors. You must still
be tweaking the page.

Some of these errors might go away if your page were HTML 4.01
Transitional instead of HTML 4.01 Strict. I use HTML 4.01
Transitional because it takes much less markup to format a page
(e.g., doing things with deprecated tags and attributes instead of
doing EVERYTHING with CSS).

--

David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>

Concerned about someone (e.g., Pres. Bush) snooping
into your E-mail? Use PGP.
See my <http://www.rossde.com/PGP/>
.



Relevant Pages

  • No pop-up but how about a pop quiz? (OT)
    ... Okay, I know this has nothing to do with html, but I just can't resist ... The following question assumes that the laws, theories, hypotheses, et al ... purchased the latest and greatest spaceship ever made. ...
    (alt.html)
  • Re: Help with BeautifulSoup
    ... heres the general idea of the html I have to work with: ... Okay, ... around the noun. ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: Help with BeautifulSoup
    ... heres the general idea of the html I have to work with: ... Okay, ... Oh, well sorry, I wrote the span tags, but they didn't show up. ... around the noun. ...
    (comp.lang.python)
  • Re: Anyone know how...
    ... Okay, having put in more effort than I should have had to, here's how ... It looks for the first occurrence of "host" within the HTML ... a regular expression is more ... The backslashes are for escaping the double-quote characters. ...
    (microsoft.public.dotnet.languages.csharp)
  • Re: Saving DB to flash drive
    ... My appologies--I try not to post my messages in HTML format. ... Otherwise, regarding your pendantic mood, its okay ... copying an open database is a risky ... > Doug Steele, Microsoft Access MVP ...
    (microsoft.public.access.gettingstarted)