Re: Could someone test this please..?
- From: David Ross <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 14 Jan 2006 11:00:51 -0800
Timothy wrote:
>
> On Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:54:08 -0800, David Ross wrote:
>
> > Okay, I finally got around to viewing some of your Web pages. Generally,
> > they are okay; but I have a few criticisms.
> >
>
> O' I knew you would 80P ........
>
> > Your Contacts page might be better if you also included a postal address.
> >
>
> I really don't want my postal address out there in the wide internet like
> that. I get enough junk mail and really don't want anonymous net trolls to
> show up at my door. The resource pages are not to generate local customers
> for my business.
>
> > Your use of an orange background (#ff9933) with white in some of your
> > boxes means that people with visual handicaps might have trouble reading
> > the text. This affect not only those with some visual impairment but also
> > those with color blindness.
> >
> Of course you have to view it when I'm playing with colors. I went and got
> a web safe color wheel.... seems to make things worse for me. Way too many
> choices. I'm sure the colors will change 5 more time before the end of the
> night 80)
>
> > In general, your links do not change color when their pages are visited.
> > Many will find this annoying.
> >
> > Your home page now has 159 HTML 4.01 Strict errors versus 29 XHTML 1.0
> > Transitional errors previously. Your style-sheet now has 1 error versus
> > no errors previously.
>
> Whoa.....! How does the validator return that to you? When I check I get a
> green light? The css error is really a work around for an internet
> destroyer bug. Keeps the navigation tabs from jumping around in IE. Just
> for full disclousre, many of the pages do not validate due to google
> adsence's script code. They generate 4 errors and I'm not about to fix
> them. Adsence forbids it.
<http://validator.w3.org/check?uri=www.resources.ywgc.com>
But now there are only 9 HTML 4.01 Strict errors. You must still
be tweaking the page.
Some of these errors might go away if your page were HTML 4.01
Transitional instead of HTML 4.01 Strict. I use HTML 4.01
Transitional because it takes much less markup to format a page
(e.g., doing things with deprecated tags and attributes instead of
doing EVERYTHING with CSS).
--
David E. Ross
<http://www.rossde.com/>
Concerned about someone (e.g., Pres. Bush) snooping
into your E-mail? Use PGP.
See my <http://www.rossde.com/PGP/>
.
- References:
- Could someone test this please..?
- From: Timothy
- Re: Could someone test this please..?
- From: David Ross
- Re: Could someone test this please..?
- From: Timothy
- Could someone test this please..?
- Prev by Date: Re: Compost bin suggestions
- Next by Date: Apple spraying?
- Previous by thread: Re: Could someone test this please..?
- Next by thread: How to burn leaves?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|