Re: Monsanto
- From: "a36guy" <a36guy@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 21 Dec 2009 21:19:52 -0800
"Steve" <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:jdpti5181nnh3u3ju30gb54igi9cs1sjo0@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
On Sun, 20 Dec 2009 17:24:47 -0800, Wildbilly <wldbilly@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>There should be a law to protect others from Monsanto crops infecting
wrote:
IF a farmer has his crop cross pollinated by a patented crop, what is he
supposed to do?
What he is supposed to do is beyond the scope of this argument.
What he is NOT supposed to do is identify, isolate, and propagate
someone else's patented property.
surrounding fields. This is were the big problem lies.
..
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Monsanto
- From: phorbin
- Re: Monsanto
- References:
- Re: Monsanto
- From: Steve Peek
- Re: Monsanto
- From: Gary Woods
- Re: Monsanto
- From: gunner
- Re: Monsanto
- From: David Hare-Scott
- Re: Monsanto
- From: gunner
- Re: Monsanto
- From: Wildbilly
- Re: Monsanto
- From: Wildbilly
- Re: Monsanto
- Prev by Date: Re: Monsanto
- Next by Date: Re: Monsanto
- Previous by thread: Re: Monsanto
- Next by thread: Re: Monsanto
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|